|
From: Matthew G. <mj...@sr...> - 2006-03-06 18:05:56
|
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:00:33PM +0100, gimli wrote: > Nope. It was the Memory Split from 3G/1G to 2G/2G. Ah, interesting. Does this imply some sort of confusion between physical addresses and virtual addresses? There would presumably still be problems on 2GB machines, and certain bits of userspace software break if the split is changed, so it's not an ideal long-term solution... -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@sr... |