From: mike d. <fl...@po...> - 2010-05-14 08:20:36
|
Tino Keitel a dit: > I didn't try efifb. I just use the DRM framebuffer along with kernel > mode setting, which is also used by the native Intel driver in Xorg. Oh, I'm gonna give that a try then. > > However, a few questions remain for me: - what are the actual > > advantages and drawbacks from booting in EFI on such a platform? > > You don't have to mess around with gptsync, which is limited to 4 > partitions. And in my setup, it created a dummy partition before the > EFI partition, lowering the limit to 3. Also, there is no delay at > boot time which is caused by the legacy BIOS. Right. The partition limit is not a big deal for me, and I don't mind about the faster bootup procedure, but is there another obvious benefit, or any drawback for that matter? > > - where is it best to put the grub.efi EFI application? is it > > advised to have it sit on the first EFI system partition, within the > > EFI folder? - if not, where? > > I created a small HFS+ partition only for grub. It has no journal, so > I can also write it in Linux to update grub or modify grub.cfg. Ok. So - what is the EFI system partition for? Seemed like a good place to put EFI applications, but when I mount it under Debian, it shows empty, while there's an EFI folder in it when I mount it under MacOS X. Any eplanation for that? Cheers, -- mike dentifrice <fl...@po...> |