From: Tino K. <tin...@ti...> - 2010-05-13 12:39:37
|
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 14:05:54 +0200, mike dentifrice wrote: [...] > > So far, everything seems to be working : efifb provides a nice > textmode console, and X.org using the 'intel' driver runs seemingly > just as fast as when legacy booted (judging by the output of > glxgears). I didn't try efifb. I just use the DRM framebuffer along with kernel mode setting, which is also used by the native Intel driver in Xorg. > However, a few questions remain for me: > - what are the actual advantages and drawbacks from booting in EFI on > such a platform? You don't have to mess around with gptsync, which is limited to 4 partitions. And in my setup, it created a dummy partition before the EFI partition, lowering the limit to 3. Also, there is no delay at boot time which is caused by the legacy BIOS. > - where is it best to put the grub.efi EFI application? is it advised to > have it sit on the first EFI system partition, within the EFI folder? > - if not, where? I created a small HFS+ partition only for grub. It has no journal, so I can also write it in Linux to update grub or modify grub.cfg. Regards, Tino |