Re: [macker-user] detecting explicit instantiation of certain classes

[Paul C. <can...@po...>]

Alex =97

You are correct that there is no way to do this currently with =20
Macker. Sorry!

It is exactly what the planned reference type differentiation feature =20=

is meant to accomplish. That feature will first differentiate only =20
method signature usages (e.g. class is returned from a method vs. =20
class is a method parameter), but will then move on to how classes =20
are used within a method body. So it will be a while, but it is in =20
the pipeline.

Cheers,

Paul

On Dec 22, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Alex Chapman wrote:

> The documentation shows how I can make a rule to identify references
> from one set of classes to another. But I'm trying to just find cases
> where one set of classes explicitly instantiates (with "new") classes
> from another set of packages. The documentation does say that being
> able to distinguish between different types of references might be
> available at some point, but I'm wondering if anyone has worked out a
> regex with Macker that can do this.
>  http://innig.net/macker/guide/accessrule.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20=

> ---
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to =20
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?=20
> page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Macker-user mailing list
> Mac...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/macker-user
>
> Macker home page: http://innig.net/macker/

_________________________________________________________________
Piano music podcast: http://inthehands.com
Other interesting stuff: http://innig.net