From: Alexander G. <ag...@su...> - 2010-08-04 09:45:08
|
On 11.03.2010, at 23:50, didier wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Alexander Graf <ag...@su...> wrote: >> >>> >>> Is using some kind of runtime check rather than a compile time ifdef >>> make sense? >> >> It probably would. But then again I'd rather see ppc32 kvm host support and >> accel extension support, deprecating the mol kmod completely. By then there >> wouldn't be any need to use the mol kmod. > Oh it's doable, how hard? I need a closer look at kvm. I forgot to update you guys on this. I got around to implement ppc32 host support myself in between and it's all upstream in the kvm.git tree. I also have a bunch of patches partially waiting to get accepted upstream and partially in my local tree still that speed up things by introducing a PV interface very similar to the MOL one. So until those are in, please don't expect MOL for KVM to be uber-fast :). Alex |