Thread: [Lxr-general] LXR Configuration Issues
Brought to you by:
ajlittoz
From: Shahbaz K. <sha...@gm...> - 2007-05-09 20:59:43
|
Its been a like two weeks that I have been trying to work out the LXR installation and configuration. I am not yet successul. Can anyone suggest a substitute cross refferencing tool as good as LXR because I have deadlines. I am working on SELinux and doing enhancement but have no prior experiance. I will appreciate a good advice. Thank you. |
From: Maximilian W. <ma...@rf...> - 2007-05-09 21:39:03
|
Am Thursday, den 10 May hub Shahbaz Khan folgendes in die Tasten: Hi! > Its been a like two weeks that I have been trying to work out the LXR > installation and configuration. I am not yet successul. > Can anyone suggest a substitute cross refferencing tool as good as LXR > because I have deadlines. Why did you not ask earlier? Maybe one could have give you some hints. So to come back to the topic of this list: What are your problems? > I am working on SELinux and doing enhancement but have no prior experiance. ? Ciao Max -- Follow the white penguin. |
From: Maximilian W. <ma...@rf...> - 2007-05-09 21:44:00
|
Am Wednesday, den 9 May hub Maximilian Wilhelm folgendes in die Tasten: Hi! > > Its been a like two weeks that I have been trying to work out the LXR > > installation and configuration. I am not yet successul. > > Can anyone suggest a substitute cross refferencing tool as good as LXR > > because I have deadlines. > Why did you not ask earlier? > Maybe one could have give you some hints. > So to come back to the topic of this list: > What are your problems? To get this more precise as my statement might be mistakable: Which parts of the installation are problematic? What does work, what does fail? Ciao Max -- Follow the white penguin. |
From: Maximilian W. <ma...@rf...> - 2007-05-10 00:11:38
|
Am Thursday, den 10 May hub Shahbaz Khan folgendes in die Tasten: Hi! Please answer to the list, so everybody can see the problems and can help. There may (will) be others who are deeper in LXR as I might be. > First of all my I cannot comprehend the version and defversion part. Sorry? > Is it necessary at all? Apache is showing the sources but there are no > hyperlinks as it should have been! What do you mean with 'showing the sources'? Is apache serving a directory listing? Can you look into your files and see the source in there? > Can you send me your configurations with a little bit of explanation > on each step while installation. The config file depends on many decisions you made (DB, search-tool) whatever. > Maybe its too much that I ask but am too stressed out with going over > and over with the installlation. > I have fedora core 6. I prefer the lxr 0.3 because of its simplicity > but you are the expert. If u need to look at my current lxr.conf let > me know. Please provide us * the version of LXR you are running (current CVS HEAD would be appreciated) * Your lxr.conf * Messages/Errors from your apache errors.log * What is running, what´s broken * What SCM do you use? Or Plain files? * What have you done so far to trace the problem(s)? Ciao Max -- Follow the white penguin. |
From: Shahbaz K. <sha...@gm...> - 2007-05-10 01:53:45
|
Following is how things are for me with lxr: 1- I am using lxr 0.3 because of its simplicity but I may give a try to 0.9.5 if anybody can help me out with each required step. Following findings are with 0.3 version. 2- I am not using any CVS. I don't know what SCM is, which might mean I am using plain files. 3- Apache has no errors. The source code is shown is a directory listing. Thus no hyperlinks (cross refferences) are shown. 4- I have gone through multiple lxr.conf files available on the internet and a debian readme which was a good explaination. I use /var/www/lxr as my install prefix thus skipping the alias thingy. The .htaccess is working and so is the access.conf. 5- The indices are generated and there was no problem. 6- I am not able to comprehend the version file and $v, and the defversion. So these settings might be bad! But I have been doing quite some trial and error with some of them. 7- I am using linux kernel 0.1 as the source code and the code is there. I have yet to download sources for kernel 2.6.18 for my fc 6. The current state is that all I see is the directory listing. Thank You. On 5/10/07, Maximilian Wilhelm <ma...@rf...> wrote: > Am Thursday, den 10 May hub Shahbaz Khan folgendes in die Tasten: > > Hi! > > Please answer to the list, so everybody can see the problems and can > help. There may (will) be others who are deeper in LXR as I might be. > > > First of all my I cannot comprehend the version and defversion part. > > Sorry? > > > Is it necessary at all? Apache is showing the sources but there are no > > hyperlinks as it should have been! > > What do you mean with 'showing the sources'? > Is apache serving a directory listing? > Can you look into your files and see the source in there? > > > Can you send me your configurations with a little bit of explanation > > on each step while installation. > > The config file depends on many decisions you made (DB, search-tool) > whatever. > > > > Maybe its too much that I ask but am too stressed out with going over > > and over with the installlation. > > I have fedora core 6. I prefer the lxr 0.3 because of its simplicity > > but you are the expert. If u need to look at my current lxr.conf let > > me know. > > Please provide us > * the version of LXR you are running (current CVS HEAD would be > appreciated) > * Your lxr.conf > * Messages/Errors from your apache errors.log > * What is running, what=B4s broken > * What SCM do you use? Or Plain files? > * What have you done so far to trace the problem(s)? > > Ciao > Max > -- > Follow the white penguin. > |
From: Jan-Benedict G. <jb...@lu...> - 2007-05-10 15:52:45
|
On Thu, 2007-05-10 06:53:43 +0500, Shahbaz Khan <sha...@gm...> wrot= e: > 1- I am using lxr 0.3 because of its simplicity but I may give a try > to 0.9.5 if anybody can help me out with each required step. Following > findings are with 0.3 version. The 0.3 version is more or less totally obsolete. > 2- I am not using any CVS. I don't know what SCM is, which might mean > I am using plain files. You need to really go into deep details here. You're using LXR, so I guess there's some kind of source tree you want to be presented by a web server. So lets start there. Is it *one* version of sources, or more than one version? In either case, where is it located? Did you simply untar one (or more) tarballs of released sources? > 3- Apache has no errors. The source code is shown is a directory > listing. Thus no hyperlinks (cross refferences) are shown. What is "a directory listing" in terms of content? Do you have a screen shot? For what it's worth, it makes a lot of sense to also place a simple index.html file into the LXR directory that points to the "source" binary. This is what actually "makes up" the sources and inserts hyperlinks et al. > 5- The indices are generated and there was no problem. "no problem" can be described as there's a reasonable amount of data in some database? > 6- I am not able to comprehend the version file and $v, and the > defversion. So these settings might be bad! But I have been doing > quite some trial and error with some of them. "$v" lists all versions of your source releases you want to present. For the Linux kernel, things like "v0.01 v2.6.0 v2.6.20" might make sense. Of course there might only be one single version. defversion is the initially selected version (choosen whenever a visitor accesses the site for the first time and didn't choose an alternate version.) > The current state is that all I see is the directory listing. If the directory listing contains a "source" entry, please click on it. MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jb...@lu... +49-172-7608481 Signature of: God put me on earth to accomplish a certain numbe= r of the second : things. Right now I am so far behind I will never = die. |