From: Kevin K. <and...@gm...> - 2013-08-07 08:29:07
|
On Wednesday, 2013-08-07, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:00 AM, PCMan <pcm...@gm...> wrote: > > 3. Should we use dconf-qt, which is done by Canonical instead, or > > using our own simple class mimicking QSettings? Personally I prefer > > our own solution and this can be included in liblxqt. > > Seeing as dconf support will ultimately end up in Qt (god knows when, > though), I recommend we use our own solution for the time being and > eventually switch to the native one. Not to forget that there is a third option: contribute an implementation to Qt upstream and then use oficial Qt API. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring |