From: Alessandro P. <al...@am...> - 2009-04-28 14:28:53
|
Il giorno mar, 28/04/2009 alle 14.33 +0100, Paulo Silva ha scritto: > The desktop icons could be displayed based on Gnome's Configuration > Editor (i don't know which file or files it edits...), just like > Nautilus does - Nautilus uses /apps/nautilus/desktop/ hierarchy tags - > items there are: computer_icon_visible, home_icon_visible (which one > early LXDE used 'My Documents' name wrongly), network_icon_visible, > trash_icon_visible, and volumes_visible I don't think it is a good idea to depend on gconf. AFAIK LXDE has no dependancy on it, and it would not be good to introduce it just for the desktop icons. > Otherwise, PcManFm needs a huge ammount of improvements, like > accessing Nautilus Scripts as easy (very, very useful!), directory > bookmarks, etc. - i can't recall all of them now, but there are plenty > of improvements needed on PcManFm, which surelly will not make them a > heavy file manager, like Nautilus were being... - as far as i can > recall, i'll keep answering this exact mailinglist post Are you sure you don't want another Nautilus? :) I think introducing scriptability in PCmanFM would make it heavy. As heavy as nautilus (I just upgraded to 2.24 from 2.22 and it is now so sloooooow). But I leave PCman to answer this. > Another situation scarred me weeks ago (also alarmed PcMan), were that > network-manager dependence on LXDE in the Ubuntu repository, removed > nm-applet due on a conflict - nm-applet could be optional, as well > among other interesting and useful file managers lxnm conflicts with network manager, as both do the same thing: manage networks. As I said, I would remove lxnm altogether and use network-manager instead, for the panel icon. Bye. -- Alessandro Pellizzari |