From: Jerome L. <je...@le...> - 2016-06-26 11:36:11
|
Are we ready? I'm ready to hit the switch. J. Leclanche |
From: Peter M. <pma...@ar...> - 2016-06-26 14:12:10
|
What ever we decide there are two bugs I'd deem worth having another look at before releasing: https://github.com/lxde/lxqt/issues/1032 A corresponding warning message is coming up on every new user profile, the solution isn't exactly intuitive to detect so I figure this is an annoyance for newbies. The fix involves exchanging the template rc.xml of Openbox only and is hence rather easy. panel resizing issue Panel from current master doesn't adapt to resolution changes on single-monitor systems as can be seen in the screenshot at https://github.com/lxde/lxqt-panel/pull/310#issuecomment-211419224. This is a regression introduced by the fix (https://github.com/lxde/lxqt-panel/commit/52627ad) of a similar problem on multi-monitor systems (https://github.com/lxde/lxqt/issues/990). A fix of this regression is provided in branch https://github.com/lxde/lxqt-panel/tree/fix-resize but introduces yet another problem on multi-monitor systems, see https://github.com/lxde/lxqt-panel/pull/310#issuecomment-215278898. The regression is probably irrelevant on real hardware where the native resolution of display devices only is used these days. It is a problem in virtual machines, though, which will probably be used to review the new release. Maybe we could merge branch "fixe-resize" besides it introduces another problem which we could still address after the release. |
From: Shawn W D. <sf...@op...> - 2016-06-26 21:53:04
|
On 06/26/2016 04:35 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > Are we ready? I'm ready to hit the switch. > > J. Leclanche > > Yeah, should be good to go over here in openSUSE land, just might be towards the end of the week before I have everything packaged up |
From: Paulo L. <pau...@gm...> - 2016-06-28 13:46:56
|
The sleep/suspend/lock thing has been merged. However, there are still issues in the current milestone to be fixed. I moved some of them to 0.12 today. There are still 9 open issues, and I'm not sure we should hit the switch before fixing them. Maybe I'm wrong about some of them, please give your (Palo, Luis, Jerome, Alf and others) opinions (preferrably on Github) about the issues that can be postponed. And let's focus on fixing the ones that we settle on that can't. Paulo Lieuthier On 06/27/2016 04:16 AM, Palo Kisa wrote: > I think we could wait a couple of days for the sleep/suspend/lock to finish. > > palo > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Jerome Leclanche <je...@le... > <mailto:je...@le...>> wrote: > > Are we ready? I'm ready to hit the switch. > > J. Leclanche > > |
From: Luís P. <lui...@gm...> - 2016-06-29 22:40:16
|
I'm testing a solution for the remaining issue with the screensaver unlock. It's all going well. I'm planning to submit a PR tomorrow. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Paulo Lieuthier <pau...@gm...> wrote: > The sleep/suspend/lock thing has been merged. However, there are still > issues in the current milestone to be fixed. I moved some of them to 0.12 > today. There are still 9 open issues, and I'm not sure we should hit the > switch before fixing them. Maybe I'm wrong about some of them, please give > your (Palo, Luis, Jerome, Alf and others) opinions (preferrably on Github) > about the issues that can be postponed. And let's focus on fixing the ones > that we settle on that can't. > > Paulo Lieuthier > > > On 06/27/2016 04:16 AM, Palo Kisa wrote: > > I think we could wait a couple of days for the sleep/suspend/lock to > finish. > > palo > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Jerome Leclanche < <je...@le...> > je...@le...> wrote: > >> Are we ready? I'm ready to hit the switch. >> >> J. Leclanche >> > > > -- Luís Pereira |
From: Balló G. <bal...@gm...> - 2016-07-24 20:42:40
|
Is there any news about new LXQt release? Is anyone working on fixing http://git.lxde.org/ and http://downloads.lxqt.org/lxqt/ ? Is anyone working on fixing http://pootle.lxde.org/ ? It looks like the project is dead, or at least some major organisation problems, if nobody cares about keeping these services alive for a long time. -- György Balló Arch Linux Trusted User |
From: solarflow99 <sol...@gm...> - 2016-07-24 20:51:30
|
Ice had various bugs reported in red hat bugzilla that were ignored for years. Maybe lxqt is what we should be using now? I don't see why both even exist On Jul 24, 2016 1:46 PM, "Balló György" <bal...@gm...> wrote: > Is there any news about new LXQt release? > > Is anyone working on fixing http://git.lxde.org/ and > http://downloads.lxqt.org/lxqt/ ? > > Is anyone working on fixing http://pootle.lxde.org/ ? > > It looks like the project is dead, or at least some major organisation > problems, if nobody cares about keeping these services alive for a long > time. > > -- > György Balló > Arch Linux Trusted User > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > traffic > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols > are > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > planning > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Lxde-list mailing list > Lxd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list > > |
From: Jerome L. <je...@le...> - 2016-07-25 09:13:26
|
The git/download server works fine, it was brought back online a while ago. As for Pootle, I've personally given up on it, it was taking far too much of my time. I'm ready to fire a release but it'll be the last one I directly maintain. My current work leaves me no time to do much on LXQt itself outside of Arch Linux. We need volunteers to help with long term management of the project. Alf Gaida and Paulo Lieuthier have both been helping out with it, but we need more help. J. Leclanche On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Balló György <bal...@gm...> wrote: > Is there any news about new LXQt release? > > Is anyone working on fixing http://git.lxde.org/ and > http://downloads.lxqt.org/lxqt/ ? > > Is anyone working on fixing http://pootle.lxde.org/ ? > > It looks like the project is dead, or at least some major organisation > problems, if nobody cares about keeping these services alive for a long > time. > > -- > György Balló > Arch Linux Trusted User > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > planning > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Lxde-list mailing list > Lxd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list > |
From: Balló G. <bal...@gm...> - 2016-07-25 11:03:24
|
2016-07-25 11:12 GMT+02:00 Jerome Leclanche <je...@le...>: > The git/download server works fine, it was brought back online a while > ago. Yesterday it was unreachable again for some reason. I would be more relaxed if the LXDE components (the non-LXQt part) would be moved, or at least mirrored on GitHub. Currently if the server is down, I can't access the git repositories. > As for Pootle, I've personally given up on it, it was taking far > too much of my time. > Then it would be considerable to move the translation system to some other platform, e.g. to Transifex. > I'm ready to fire a release but it'll be the last one I directly > maintain. My current work leaves me no time to do much on LXQt itself > outside of Arch Linux. > Okay, and thanks for your effort. -- György Balló Arch Linux Trusted User |