From: Bob B. <bob...@ma...> - 2013-10-09 01:06:37
|
(This message is mainly for Debian LXDE maintainers; unforunately, my messages doesn't reach lxde-debian at lists.lxde.org, looks like super-anti-spam for me). The "fresh" (1.1.2) versions of LibFM & PCManFM can't migrate from Debian unstable to testing due to menu-cache being stuck at migration. menu-cache (0.5.0) source package no longer builds libmenu-cache1 & libmenu-cache1-dev binary packages; unfortunately, these obsolete binary packages currently have some reverse build-dependencies [1, 2, 3] on them, so they can't be removed by ftpmasters [4]: --- * source package menu-cache version 0.5.0-1 no longer builds binary package(s): libmenu-cache1 libmenu-cache1-dev on amd64,armel,armhf,i386,ia64,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x,sparc - suggested command: dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by menu-cache)" -s unstable -a amd64,armel,armhf,i386,ia64,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x,sparc -p -R -b libmenu-cache1 libmenu-cache1-dev - broken Depends: lxlauncher: lxlauncher - broken Build-Depends: libfm: libmenu-cache1-dev lxappearance: libmenu-cache1-dev lxappearance-obconf: libmenu-cache1-dev lxlauncher: libmenu-cache1-dev lxpanel: libmenu-cache1-dev pcmanfm: libmenu-cache1-dev --- [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722110 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722111 [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722112 [4] http://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt ---- Best wishes, Bob |
From: Bob B. <bob...@ma...> - 2013-11-20 01:20:47
|
Hello! Is there any progress in uploading the updated versions of the following packages: lxlauncher, lxappearance, lxappearance-obconf, menu-cache, libfm into Debian archives? Should the packages be uploaded to debian-mentors by active developers with no upload priviliges, to get them reviewed & uploaded by someone else? The Xmas holidays are relentlessly impending :) ---- Best wishes, Bob |
From: Martin B. / b. <br...@bs...> - 2013-11-20 10:06:01
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-11-20 02:20, Bob Bib wrote: > Should the packages be uploaded to debian-mentors by active > developers with no upload priviliges, to get them reviewed & > uploaded by someone else? I will announce the upcoming release updates soon. Minor updates to get updated translations out, and what ever minor bug fixes that might be in HEAD without proper releases. That's all I can give as hints. - -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSjIl7AAoJEJbdSEaj0jV7yJ0IAIoEsYs0JOWAyJCDv9FNKXB4 3DZyugkfDG7ZlUboYsTalWjsWQe8jUp5Iz88yr31pIUlaX2uwkAKjyPDAYPjN9VL VIKcT2kVuU6cHlfczALFq6xkDTyftrfcOD5fKgr8OF4FKg5l5jiX1QLLh4tYkMe0 5ZvGqPzXL14PjU2OmfvUQ0uiQbZQvpo87a6XxVXTankncEYXC6zR5ovyz1PQNFQY ztAdQDLSs3poWxq2pm8uFgcp96cGWH7GVhdterDchZTocTu/jgyS+rN5+QTV9ouO FrsoyE2Lokty58L5bIc+dvfLU/mEh/V3QkmdZkGU1dCyuaN0D+y7macre0KSdq0= =t1vo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Andrej N. G. <an...@re...> - 2013-11-20 12:11:18
|
Hello! Bob Bib has written on Wednesday, 20 November, at 5:20: >Is there any progress in uploading the updated versions of the following packages: > lxlauncher, lxappearance, lxappearance-obconf, > menu-cache, libfm >into Debian archives? Yes, there is some progress, the menu-cache is already uploaded and sits in NEW queue. >Should the packages be uploaded to debian-mentors >by active developers with no upload priviliges, >to get them reviewed & uploaded by someone else? Be patient, please. Other packages will be uploaded eventually too, I believe. :) >The Xmas holidays are relentlessly impending :) Cheers! Andriy. |
From: Andrej N. G. <an...@re...> - 2013-10-09 12:15:59
|
Hello! Bob Bib has written on Wednesday, 9 October, at 5:05: >(This message is mainly for Debian LXDE maintainers; >unforunately, my messages doesn't reach lxde-debian at lists.lxde.org, >looks like super-anti-spam for me). >The "fresh" (1.1.2) versions of LibFM & PCManFM can't migrate >from Debian unstable to testing due to menu-cache being stuck at migration. >menu-cache (0.5.0) source package no longer builds >libmenu-cache1 & libmenu-cache1-dev binary packages; >unfortunately, these obsolete binary packages >currently have some reverse build-dependencies [1, 2, 3] on them, >so they can't be removed by ftpmasters [4]: >--- >* source package menu-cache version 0.5.0-1 no longer builds > binary package(s): libmenu-cache1 libmenu-cache1-dev > on amd64,armel,armhf,i386,ia64,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x,sparc > - suggested command: > dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by menu-cache)" -s unstable -a amd64,armel,armhf,i386,ia64,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x,sparc -p -R -b libmenu-cache1 libmenu-cache1-dev > - broken Depends: > lxlauncher: lxlauncher I cannot find such dependency in release 0.2.2-3. > - broken Build-Depends: > libfm: libmenu-cache1-dev The new libfm (which is in unstable) depends on libmenu-cache-dev instead. > lxappearance: libmenu-cache1-dev Dependency removed at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. > lxappearance-obconf: libmenu-cache1-dev Dependency removed at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. > lxlauncher: libmenu-cache1-dev Dependency changed to libmenu-cache-dev at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. > lxpanel: libmenu-cache1-dev The new lxpanel (which is in unstable) depends on libmenu-cache-dev instead. > pcmanfm: libmenu-cache1-dev Dependency is already removed from new pcmanfm (which is in unstable). >--- >[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722110 >[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722111 >[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722112 >[4] http://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt With best regards, Andriy. |
From: Bob B. <bob...@ma...> - 2013-10-10 00:39:45
|
Wed, 9 Oct 2013, 15:15 +03:00 from Andrej N. Gritsenko: > > - broken Depends: > > lxlauncher: lxlauncher > > I cannot find such dependency in release 0.2.2-3. Looks like it means that 'lxlauncher' bin-pkg built from eponymous src-pkg depends on some no-longer-built-from-'menu-cache'-src bin-pkg ('libmenu-cache1'); anyway that '${shlibs:Depends}' dependency should go away after package rebuild against the fresh menu-cache. But that string is not intuitive enough, so I've reported it as a bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725922 > > - broken Build-Depends: > > libfm: libmenu-cache1-dev > > The new libfm (which is in unstable) depends on libmenu-cache-dev instead. > > lxpanel: libmenu-cache1-dev > > The new lxpanel (which is in unstable) depends on libmenu-cache-dev instead. > > > pcmanfm: libmenu-cache1-dev > > Dependency is already removed from new pcmanfm (which is in unstable). You're right. That data looks quite outdated, or maybe ftpmaster "DAK" tool wrongly scanned some packages in testing etc., in addition to unstable ones... I don't know. I've reported this issue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725916 > > lxappearance: libmenu-cache1-dev > > Dependency removed at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. > > > lxappearance-obconf: libmenu-cache1-dev > > Dependency removed at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. > > > lxlauncher: libmenu-cache1-dev > > Dependency changed to libmenu-cache-dev at git.lxde.org, update's pending > upload. Thanks. I should've looked at that git repository: your commits will close Debian bugs 722111, 722112, 722110 respectively. I'm looking forward for fresh uploads :) ---- Best wishes, Bob |
From: Andrej N. G. <an...@re...> - 2013-10-10 10:53:18
|
Hello! Bob Bib has written on Thursday, 10 October, at 4:39: >Wed, 9 Oct 2013, 15:15 +03:00 from Andrej N. Gritsenko: >> > - broken Depends: >> > lxlauncher: lxlauncher >> >> I cannot find such dependency in release 0.2.2-3. >Looks like it means that 'lxlauncher' bin-pkg built from eponymous src-pkg >depends on some no-longer-built-from-'menu-cache'-src bin-pkg ('libmenu-cache1'); >anyway that '${shlibs:Depends}' dependency >should go away after package rebuild against the fresh menu-cache. >But that string is not intuitive enough, so I've reported it as a bug: >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725922 >> > - broken Build-Depends: >> > libfm: libmenu-cache1-dev >> >> The new libfm (which is in unstable) depends on libmenu-cache-dev instead. >> > lxpanel: libmenu-cache1-dev >> >> The new lxpanel (which is in unstable) depends on libmenu-cache-dev instead. >> >> > pcmanfm: libmenu-cache1-dev >> >> Dependency is already removed from new pcmanfm (which is in unstable). >You're right. >That data looks quite outdated, >or maybe ftpmaster "DAK" tool wrongly scanned some packages in testing etc., >in addition to unstable ones... I don't know. >I've reported this issue: >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725916 They've replied this is because there are still old versions of those packages in use. According to http://packages.debian.org/sid/lxpanel the hurd-i386 still uses 0.5.10. The same goes for libfm. I believe that is due to libmenu-cache3 wasn't built for hurd-i386. So I should merge 0.5.1 upstream first, then that problem will be fixed, then old versions would disappear from unstable and finally menu-cache can migrate into testing. Well, I've pushed required change into git.lxde.org, it will require upload for new version as well. >> > lxappearance: libmenu-cache1-dev >> >> Dependency removed at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. >> >> > lxappearance-obconf: libmenu-cache1-dev >> >> Dependency removed at git.lxde.org, update's pending upload. >> >> > lxlauncher: libmenu-cache1-dev >> >> Dependency changed to libmenu-cache-dev at git.lxde.org, update's pending >> upload. >Thanks. I should've looked at that git repository: >your commits will close Debian bugs 722111, 722112, 722110 respectively. >I'm looking forward for fresh uploads :) That is completely depend on Andrew Lee, I cannot do that. :) Cheers! Andriy. |
From: Bob B. <bob...@ma...> - 2013-10-10 19:11:58
|
Hi! Thu, 10 Oct 2013, 13:52 +03:00 from Andrej N. Gritsenko: > Hello! > > Bob Bib has written on Thursday, 10 October, at 4:39: > ... > >That data looks quite outdated, > >or maybe ftpmaster "DAK" tool wrongly scanned some packages in testing etc., > >in addition to unstable ones... I don't know. > > >I've reported this issue: > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725916 > > They've replied this is because there are still old versions of those > packages in use. According to http://packages.debian.org/sid/lxpanel the > hurd-i386 still uses 0.5.10. The same goes for libfm. I believe that is > due to libmenu-cache3 wasn't built for hurd-i386. So I should merge 0.5.1 > upstream first, then that problem will be fixed, then old versions would > disappear from unstable and finally menu-cache can migrate into testing. > > Well, I've pushed required change into git.lxde.org, it will require > upload for new version as well. Well, sometimes manual help from ftmpasters can be needed: http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals Also it's good to declare transitions explicitly as bugs: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions But maybe just uploading the fresh menu-cache, lxlauncher, lxappearance, lxappearance-obconf will fix the migration problems, who knows :) > >Thanks. I should've looked at that git repository: > >your commits will close Debian bugs 722111, 722112, 722110 respectively. > >I'm looking forward for fresh uploads :) > > That is completely depend on Andrew Lee, I cannot do that. :) Yeah, it surely needs some upload privileges... ---- Best wishes, Bob |