What about LDQt? Many people would mentally translate that into ---linux desktop Qt--- which would not be an overly bad thing... ;)


On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Tolga Dalman <tolga.dalman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 1:59:57 AM UTC+1, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Given that pretty much everyone contributing to the project has been
using LXQt in the wild and nobody really brought up good alternatives,
I think it's been implicitly agreed for a while that LXQt is the
project's name.

Since no release has happened so far, you have still the chance to come up with a cool project name. What was the meaning of 'LXQt' again ??
I mean, 'LX' implies that you want to stick forever to X11 and Qt implies that this wonderful desktop environment is inherently bound to Qt's feature, which, in my opinion, is not the case! LXDE (using GTK+) is still a great piece of software!
 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Razor-qt" group.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/razor-qt?hl=en
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Razor-qt" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to razor-qt+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.