what about bitbucket ? the web interface are more light and do not have too many js process in background... issue tracker seems more avanced rather than github...

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko <andrej@rep.kiev.ua> wrote:
    What bothers me in that article is the sentence "Currently github is
more favored." We all discussed that github is a temporary solution... I
hate github really, it is very inconvenient in some aspects and their
"issue tracker" is poor at the best. I hardly have any desire to work
with that "issue tracker", the same way as some developers ignore the SF
one.
i really hate github and sf due the web interface, use a lot of js that make my browser consumes lot of memory.. and some thing do not work due "u need to upgrade u'r browser" rule...
 
    Well, if you go back and want github not as temporary solution but as
main host for the project, I will not go agaisnt you but I will be set to
find a solution for code that I work with. For GIT web interface I have a
solution - I just install the GitWeb on one of my websites and will use
as i said.. and then this seems a good solution if plans are use github..
 
it, pushing code time to time into your loved github, but github's "issue
tracker" will never have my love so I will rarely come there and answer
any questions, that will be all your job. I'm sorry.
i agree


In panel applets list few very requested ones are missing:
 - keyboard layout display/switcher
 - directories menu
 - weather/forecast applet