Re: [Luxasm-devel] Re: Status of LuxAsm?

[Sevag K. <kah...@ya...>]

It would be really nice if the syntax could be decided.  That is after all, the most important feature of the language.
Then there could be something to work from at least, maybe write some demos or tools, etc.

If my input means anything, here are a couple of my preferences for the language implementation:

1. I would prefer the language used directives rather than archaic symbols or symbol combinations (with the exception of curly braces).

2. Apart from the machine instructions, every directive (if any will be used) should be in their own namespace, preferably the dot namespace ".<directive>"

3. Blocks: Either use curly braces { }  or .begin .end directives.

There is more of course, but baby steps...

"C.R. Chafer" <crc...@ya...> wrote: --- NoDot  wrote:

> I've been gone for a while. I don't know if Beth's still here, or
> not, nor do I know if C's here.

I'm about, just _far_ too busy to do anything towards
Luxasm, and no sign of things letting up soon.

--
C
2006-02-28


  
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Luxasm-devel mailing list
Lux...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxasm-devel



Sevag Krikorian  -=[Kain]=-

http://www.geocities.com/kahlinor/index.html
		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze.