Re: [Lurker-users] Installing Lurker on Gentoo

[<mir...@cr...>]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:42:49PM +0200, mir...@cr... wrote:
I thought I would desist, but let me see if I figured out that it was
mistaken for me to sign the two patches and send the sigs as
attachments, and if that confused SourceForge, since it is superfluous,
since the whole mail was signed.

This is sufficient, in a PGP-signe email:
> > ...
> > > 3d965c59dd6adb7f2f9b9df8eb176512fa311cbd6d50ed178af5eb6ce407851a
> > > mimelib1_1.1.4_configure.in.patch
> > > f86d8dd42f1b74e5cc81a8cb9d7505cad2d0a1f1d5b2dd99e843e1a1ad2bfba7
> > > mimelib1_1.1.4_Makefile.am.patch

and (but this is really my last ditch attmpt), find
> mimelib1_1.1.4_configure.in.patch
> mimelib1_1.1.4_Makefile.am.patch
attached without any superfluous signatures like before.

Otherwise, if they still does not arrive correctly, this will still be
my plea:
> 
> And if they still don't arrive correctly, and verifiably signed, pls.
> can some of the other subscirbers to the list, soon or some day in the
> future that it be, post them so they be publically available, please?
> Surely there'll be other people wanting to use Lurker, because it's
> really so much better than mailman, and this method is non-Debian
> specific, and probably non-Gentoo specific, the method that I used.
> 

Regards!
-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr