[Lumberjack-devel] Re: Clarification (was pl. help)
Brought to you by:
mluker
|
From: Chandrasekhar B. <ba...@te...> - 2001-06-12 17:08:20
|
Matt, Now I know the source of all confusion. Its me, but not my programming! Looks like there is another Lumberjack, the logging API implementation on sourceforge.net. The first time I downloaded the stuff, I forgot to bookmark and the next time I searched for it for mailing my problem, I found the other one. I found a different name under developer and was surprised, but thought it was a change. Now I searched Sourceforge again and found the other Lumberjack too. Sorry for the confusion, Balla Matt Luker wrote: > ko...@re... wrote: > > I'm going to go out on a limb here, but if you put your test class in > > the package java.util.logging it will send that request to the > > bootloader--which is native. It would be my guess that the exception > > you are encountering is the bootloader becoming very confused or dying > > because it thinks it has a critical error or security breach. > > > > Using the lumberjack-0.8.1 package and JDK 1.2.2, I was able to get it > > running and working using the instructions in the READMEs. > > > > The classes are under com.redstarhackers.lumberjack.*. > > I stated what I think the problem is, but not the solution ... oops! > > I would move your class from java.util.logging to balla or some default > package. The java.* packages are reserved and I would be unsure how > putting a class in that tree would behave on all platforms. > > Instead of java.util.logging, call it balla.logging or com.techone.logging. > > Let me know if that helps. > > Matt |