[Lumberjack-devel] Clarification (was pl. help)

[<ko...@re...>]

ko...@re... wrote:
> I'm going to go out on a limb here, but if you put your test class in
> the package java.util.logging it will send that request to the
> bootloader--which is native.  It would be my guess that the exception 
> you are encountering is the bootloader becoming very confused or dying 
> because it thinks it has a critical error or security breach.
> 
> Using the lumberjack-0.8.1 package and JDK 1.2.2, I was able to get it
> running and working using the instructions in the READMEs.
> 
> The classes are under com.redstarhackers.lumberjack.*.

I stated what I think the problem is, but not the solution ... oops!

I would move your class from java.util.logging to balla or some default
package.  The java.* packages are reserved and I would be unsure how 
putting a class in that tree would behave on all platforms.

Instead of java.util.logging, call it balla.logging or com.techone.logging.

Let me know if that helps.

Matt