Re: [luabind] Naming library with proper SONAME
Brought to you by:
arvidn,
daniel_wallin
From: Goswin v. B. <gos...@we...> - 2009-03-11 08:01:41
|
Roberto C. Sánchez <ro...@co...> writes: > [My apologies in advance for the cross-posting.] > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Daniel Wallin wrote: >> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> >> >> > So, I've been trying to build the Debian package with the latest from >> > the 0.8 branch on github. It seems like the SONAME thing is not >> > completely resolved. I am seeing this after building: >> > >> > roberto@miami:~/src/luabind-upstream$ objdump -p ./bin/gcc-4.3.2/debug/libluabindd.so.0.8.0 |grep SONAME >> > SONAME libluabindd.so.0.8.0 >> >> Yes, that's the expected result, isn't it? The reasoning was that it's >> too difficult to have ABI-compatibility, so we just use the complete >> version number as the SONAME. "bjam install" will create the unversioned >> symlink. >> > > I am curious as to what people generally think of how the libluabind > SONAME will be going forward. I know that certain packages (like > libssl) have the complete version in the SONAME, but I can't imagine > that this is a really good idea. Is this a showstopper for having > libluabind in Debian, or just for a stable release? Is this > discouraged, but otherwise permissible? > > I've looked in the Debian library packaging guide and it does not say > one way or the other. > > I'd appreciate any insights and/or comments. > > Regards, > > -Roberto The ABI needs to be compatible across all versions with the same SONAME. If that means every upstream release gets a new SONAME than I curse upstream for breaking their ABI all the time but the SONAME would still be right. This should not really be a showstopper but maintaining this won't be too easy. Every new upstream release will need a binary package name change, NEW procesing and a library transition. You better hope that the API doesn't change as often so binNMUs can be done. One would hope that at some point there will be a libluabindd 1.0.0 which would then have a more stable ABI. MfG Goswin |