Re: [Ltsp-discuss] suggestion for a 25 client installation

[Kanwar R. S. <m3...@ro...>]

On Thu, 2006-11-05 at 11:42 +0200, Zoilo Gomez wrote:
> You did not read (understand) my request.

Nope, I didn't.  I skimmed it and started replying before I finished
reading it!  Sorry about the mix up.

> I have no performance problems at all. I was just interested in a 
> factual comparison of the 2 technologies SCSI and SATA.

I'm really surprised about that.  But, if you're happy with the
performance, that's all that counts.

> I am not interested in rules and prohibitions, only in experience, facts 
> and reasoning.

Sure, I understand that.  I feel the same way.  However, what I stated
(even though it didn't answer your original question) _was_ based on
experience, facts and reasoning.  I haven't built large Linux thin
client systems based on intuition - that would be suicide.  My
consulting firm would crash and burn.

I apologize again for not understanding what you were looking for.
Hopefully some of what I wrote was useful.

Regards,

Ranbir

-- 
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.16-1.2108_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 
11:15:41 up 1 day, 4:45, 2 users, load average: 0.88, 0.48, 0.22