Re: [LTP] suggest removing scanner from makefile.

[Manoj I. <ma...@au...>]

Paul,

But paul, I dont know how they are using it! coz it doesint work! its BROKE!

Hope you are enjoying the ice and snow, I have some interesting stories 
from my first experience driving on ice!

And, thanks for al the info.

Later
Manjo

> I do know for a fact that there are people who still use scanner.  I 
> suspected so but it was confirmed for me recently.
>
> -Paul Larson
>
> Manoj Iyer wrote:
>
>>
>> My suggestion is not to build the program "scanner", this program is 
>> broken anyways. It can be removed from the makefile. This is the only 
>> one program that requires lex or flex to be installed. My recent 
>> changes to pan does the job of scanner program anyways.
>>
>> Any different opinions???
>>
>> Cheers
>> Manoj Iyer
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm doing some testing on a RedHat8 box which runs a min. set of 
>>> packages.
>>> I had no 'lex' tool, so the makefile terminated halfway through (near
>>> pan/scan.c).
>>>
>>> As far as I could see, this is not documented anywhere, so I added 
>>> this to
>>> the INSTALL notes (attached)
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>>
>>> 32a33,34
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> *NOTE: Some of the Makefiles (ex: pan/Makefile) require the lex (or 
>>>> flex)
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> package to be installed.
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ltp-list mailing list
>> Ltp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>
>
>
>
>