From: Cyril H. <ch...@su...> - 2012-02-02 15:21:59
|
Hi! > >> + > >> + for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) { > >> + Tst_count = 0; > >> + > >> + fd = open(TESTFILE, O_RDWR); > >> + if (fd == -1) > >> + tst_brkm(TBROK|TCONF, NULL, "open %s", TESTFILE); > > > > I know that we don't have a clear definition for these particular > > bitflags (which I would like to fix), however TCONF|TBROK seems strange > > to me. As TCONF is "testcase not appropriate for your system" and TBROK > > "testcase broken". I think that only TRBOK is better result here. > > > > Other than that it's ready for commit. > > Oops.. I was meant `TBROK|TERRNO` :-( Ah, right, that makes more sense. :) -- Cyril Hrubis ch...@su... |