Re: [LTP] POSIX "sched_yield/1-1.c" build failed

[Hannu H. <ha...@ik...>]

On 15/09/10 09:18 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> That seems like a reasonable thing to do, but here's an alternative
> way to do this (less variables):
> 
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/include/posixtest.h
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/include/posixtest.h
> @@ -10,10 +10,24 @@
>   * return codes
>   */
> 
> +/*
> + * Define PTS_DEVELOPER_MODE if you want to compile for developer scenarios,
> + * including reporting errors (as opposed to warnings), when compiling some
> + * test programs.
> + */
> +
>  #if defined(_GNU_SOURCE)
> +#if defined(PTS_DEVELOPER_MODE)
>  #error "Contains GNU-isms that need fixing."
> +#else
> +#warning "Contains GNU-isms that need fixing."
> +#endif
>  #elif defined(_BSD_SOURCE)
> +#if defined(PTS_DEVELOPER_MODE)
>  #error "Contains BSD-isms that need fixing."
> +#else
> +#warning "Contains BSD-isms that need fixing."
> +#endif
>  #endif
> 
>  #define PTS_PASS        0
> 
> Thanks for the idea Hannu :),
> -Garrett
> 

Ok, even better, less is always good! Developer mode sounds good. 

Should this posixtest.h be kind of a must include for all test cases?
Currently not all cases include this. 

br,
Hannu