From: Robert W. <ro...@us...> - 2007-11-28 00:05:59
|
I agree. With the LTP so big and widely used, we need to "protect" ourselves = better. -Robbie ----------------- Robert "Robbie" Williamson <ro...@us...> Test & Internal Support Manager IBM Linux Technology Center ----- Original Message ----- From: Ricardo Salveti de Araujo [rsa...@li...] Sent: 11/27/2007 06:58 PM To: ltp...@li...; gk...@au... Subject: Re: [LTP] Developer's Certificate of Origin On Tuesday 27 November 2007 13:03:41 George Kraft wrote: >I would like to propose that LTP adopt kernel.org's Developer's >Certificate of Origin ("sign-off") process. > >http://kerneltrap.org/files/Jeremy/DCO.txt > >I believe this is an easy quality procedure to help maintain the >stability of the project. You simply add a sign-off line to the top of >your patch being contributed. This quality record will then be >archived with the patch by mailman or bugzilla. I think that would be good to adopt this kind of certificate, specially to avoid problems with wrong copyright or wrong license at contributed code. -- Ricardo Salveti de Araujo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list |