From: Yi Xu <yx...@su...> - 2006-09-25 10:26:03
|
Hi, Attached two patches are for sem_post_5_1 and sem_post_8_1. Would you please take a look? Thank you. Brief discriotion: sem_post_5_1: As according to its intention " * 3) Call sleep(1) and then alarm(1) ", move sleep() before alarm(), test will PASS. sem_post_8_1: Though step 3 intended: " * 3. The children lock the semaphore. * Make sure the two children are waiting." Without that certain piece of code which explicitly make children waiting, the test will PASS, and children _are_ waiting. That piece of code caused confusion, or fail. -- Yi Xu |
From: Randy D. <rd...@xe...> - 2006-09-25 15:05:34
|
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:28:15 +0200 Yi Xu wrote: > Hi, > > Attached two patches are for sem_post_5_1 and sem_post_8_1. Would you please > take a look? Thank you. Brief discriotion: Does someone keep openposix test suite and LTP patches coordinated/merged? > sem_post_5_1: > As according to its intention " * 3) Call sleep(1) and then alarm(1) ", > move sleep() before alarm(), test will PASS. > > sem_post_8_1: > Though step 3 intended: " * 3. The children lock the semaphore. * Make sure > the two children are waiting." > Without that certain piece of code which explicitly make children waiting, the > test will PASS, and children _are_ waiting. > That piece of code caused confusion, or fail. --- ~Randy |