From: Kumar G. <ga...@ke...> - 2007-11-13 05:25:24
|
any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control? - k |
From: Mike F. <va...@ge...> - 2007-11-13 07:28:20
|
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: > any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control? not until sf.net supports it -mike |
From: Kumar G. <ga...@ke...> - 2007-11-13 08:10:22
|
On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: >> any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control? > > not until sf.net supports it Any particular reason it has to be hosted on sf.net? I'm sure kernel.org would be happy to host a git repo for ltp. - k |
From: Mike F. <va...@ge...> - 2007-11-13 08:23:45
|
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control? > > > > not until sf.net supports it > > Any particular reason it has to be hosted on sf.net? > > I'm sure kernel.org would be happy to host a git repo for ltp. sf.net is not used just for scm hosting. -mike |
From: Kumar G. <ga...@ke...> - 2007-11-13 08:25:14
|
On Nov 13, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control? >>> >>> not until sf.net supports it >> >> Any particular reason it has to be hosted on sf.net? >> >> I'm sure kernel.org would be happy to host a git repo for ltp. > > sf.net is not used just for scm hosting. sure, I understand that. Nothing stops a project from using sf.net for everything but scm. - k |
From: Kumar G. <ga...@ke...> - 2007-11-30 16:30:42
|
So I brought this issue up in the past. And want to comment on it a bit further. 1. If you haven't watch the talk Linus gave @ google related to git I highly recommend watching it: http://youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 2. I'm mainly a kernel developer and I agree there is some learning curve to GIT vs CVS. However I think once you spend a week with GIT you'll see that from distributed open source projects its clearly a much better choice. - k |