Menu
▾
▴
looper-devel — Looper and LooperDB mailing list.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(21) |
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
|
May
(18) |
Jun
|
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ravi M. <rav...@ya...> - 2015-03-17 14:25:39
|
I seem to be unable to use the logrotate feature within the OS to rotate log files that looperng creates. I have to stop looperng process and run the logrotate. Is there a way to rotate logs without stopping the looperng process? ThanksRavi |
|
From: Dustin M. <dma...@gm...> - 2014-08-23 03:29:53
|
I'm one of the ones that would love to see Looper thrive and continue, yet sadly am not able to help it do that at this point in time. I think SNMPv3 support is very important for this to happen, however I'll admit that I'm kind of not thrilled by relying on another daemon though. I haven't looked recently, is that the only perl module that provides decent SNMPv3 support? -Dustin On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Eckles, David <Dav...@in...> wrote: > Beginning to work on adding SNMPv3 support to looper as we need to support it now and I have yet to find something as useful and flexible as LooperNG has been for us. I'm currently headed down the route of Net-SNMP, using the embedded Perl module NetSNMP::TrapReceiver. I'm at the point where I have snmptrapd configured and a basic Perl module in place that is successfully dumping the contents of all traps received (including v3, both traps and informs). This of course is all outside of LooperNG. > > The approach I'm planning on is to rewrite snmpd_in to use snmptrapd with the embedded Perl to dump the incoming traps and align the variables with those that Looper is already expecting, replacing SNMP_Session, of course. I'm curious if you went down the same road and perhaps had some tips? Or did you go a different route with regard to trap processing? Or did you not even get to this part?? > > Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:01 AM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > My attempted rewrite died, the 4 man team fell apart when 3 of them went > off and got new jobs that required travel. > > Jacob > > On 7/10/2014 11:41 AM, Eckles, David wrote: >> Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. >> >>>From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP - would you concur? >> >> Thanks! >> DJE >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] >> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >> >> Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? >> >> I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] >> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >> >> It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. >> There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. >> >> We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP >> sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the >> feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a >> manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a >> real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure >> the module requirements are flexible for the environment. >> >> Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a >> core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like >> the SNMPv3 module. >> >> Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to >> having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and >> throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. >> >> Jacob >> >> On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >>> How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> DJE >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] >>> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM >>> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >>> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >>> >>> SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure >>> which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) >>> >>> Jacob >>> >>> On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >>>> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >>>> >>>> DJE >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> looper-devel mailing list >>>> loo...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> looper-devel mailing list >>> loo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >>> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >>> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >>> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >>> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >>> _______________________________________________ >>> looper-devel mailing list >>> loo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse >> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition >> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows >> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Eckles, D. <Dav...@in...> - 2014-08-04 20:50:20
|
Beginning to work on adding SNMPv3 support to looper as we need to support it now and I have yet to find something as useful and flexible as LooperNG has been for us. I'm currently headed down the route of Net-SNMP, using the embedded Perl module NetSNMP::TrapReceiver. I'm at the point where I have snmptrapd configured and a basic Perl module in place that is successfully dumping the contents of all traps received (including v3, both traps and informs). This of course is all outside of LooperNG. The approach I'm planning on is to rewrite snmpd_in to use snmptrapd with the embedded Perl to dump the incoming traps and align the variables with those that Looper is already expecting, replacing SNMP_Session, of course. I'm curious if you went down the same road and perhaps had some tips? Or did you go a different route with regard to trap processing? Or did you not even get to this part?? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!! DJE -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:01 AM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" My attempted rewrite died, the 4 man team fell apart when 3 of them went off and got new jobs that required travel. Jacob On 7/10/2014 11:41 AM, Eckles, David wrote: > Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. > >>From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP - would you concur? > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? > > I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. > There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. > > We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP > sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the > feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a > manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a > real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure > the module requirements are flexible for the environment. > > Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a > core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like > the SNMPv3 module. > > Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to > having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and > throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. > > Jacob > > On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. >> >> Thanks! >> DJE >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] >> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >> >> SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure >> which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) >> >> Jacob >> >> On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >>> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >>> >>> DJE >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> looper-devel mailing list >>> loo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: <obs...@gm...> - 2014-07-10 19:47:55
|
ok infinity times the price From: Mohit Muthanna Cheppudira Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:52 AM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:27 PM, <obs...@gm...> wrote: Thanks for trying, it is a very valuable tool that is worth 1000 times the price or more So $0? :-) From: Jacob Steinberger Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:01 AM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. My attempted rewrite died, the 4 man team fell apart when 3 of them went off and got new jobs that required travel. Jacob On 7/10/2014 11:41 AM, Eckles, David wrote: > Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. > >>From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP - would you concur? > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? > > I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. > There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. > > We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP > sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the > feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a > manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a > real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure > the module requirements are flexible for the environment. > > Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a > core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like > the SNMPv3 module. > > Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to > having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and > throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. > > Jacob > > On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. >> >> Thanks! >> DJE >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] >> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >> >> SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure >> which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) >> >> Jacob >> >> On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >>> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >>> >>> DJE >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> looper-devel mailing list >>> loo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel -- Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com] |
|
From: Mohit M. C. <mo...@mu...> - 2014-07-10 18:53:23
|
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:27 PM, <obs...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks for trying, it is a very valuable tool that is worth 1000 times > the price or more > So $0? :-) > *From:* Jacob Steinberger <tre...@re...> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:01 AM > *To:* Looper/LooperDB mailing list. <loo...@li...> > > My attempted rewrite died, the 4 man team fell apart when 3 of them went > off and got new jobs that required travel. > > Jacob > > On 7/10/2014 11:41 AM, Eckles, David wrote: > > Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are > getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I > was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I > may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. > > > >>From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is > NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP > - would you concur? > > > > Thanks! > > DJE > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM > > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > > > Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta > tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are > working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe > there are a couple available? > > > > I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support > sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. > Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session > with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP > module front when you get to that point - > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM > > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > > > It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. > > There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. > > > > We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP > > sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the > > feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a > > manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a > > real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure > > the module requirements are flexible for the environment. > > > > Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a > > core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like > > the SNMPv3 module. > > > > Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to > > having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and > > throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. > > > > Jacob > > > > On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > >> How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development > effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after > supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any > development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can > help test/develop. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> DJE > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > >> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM > >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > >> > >> SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure > >> which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) > >> > >> Jacob > >> > >> On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > >>> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which > would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to > Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 > traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this > won't require moving heaven and earth! > >>> > >>> DJE > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> Live Security Virtual Conference > >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > Discussions > >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > malware > >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> looper-devel mailing list > >>> loo...@li... > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > >>> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Live Security Virtual Conference > >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > Discussions > >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > malware > >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> looper-devel mailing list > >> loo...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > >> _______________________________________________ > >> looper-devel mailing list > >> loo...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > > _______________________________________________ > > looper-devel mailing list > > loo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > > _______________________________________________ > > looper-devel mailing list > > loo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community > Edition > > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > > _______________________________________________ > > looper-devel mailing list > > loo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > -- Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com] |
|
From: <obs...@gm...> - 2014-07-10 18:28:39
|
Thanks for trying, it is a very valuable tool that is worth 1000 times the price or more From: Jacob Steinberger Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:01 AM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. My attempted rewrite died, the 4 man team fell apart when 3 of them went off and got new jobs that required travel. Jacob On 7/10/2014 11:41 AM, Eckles, David wrote: > Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. > >>From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP - would you concur? > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? > > I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. > There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. > > We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP > sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the > feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a > manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a > real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure > the module requirements are flexible for the environment. > > Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a > core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like > the SNMPv3 module. > > Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to > having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and > throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. > > Jacob > > On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. >> >> Thanks! >> DJE >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] >> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >> >> SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure >> which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) >> >> Jacob >> >> On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >>> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >>> >>> DJE >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> looper-devel mailing list >>> loo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2014-07-10 18:22:38
|
My attempted rewrite died, the 4 man team fell apart when 3 of them went off and got new jobs that required travel. Jacob On 7/10/2014 11:41 AM, Eckles, David wrote: > Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. > >>From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP - would you concur? > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? > > I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. > There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. > > We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP > sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the > feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a > manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a > real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure > the module requirements are flexible for the environment. > > Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a > core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like > the SNMPv3 module. > > Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to > having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and > throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. > > Jacob > > On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. >> >> Thanks! >> DJE >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] >> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM >> To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" >> >> SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure >> which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) >> >> Jacob >> >> On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >>> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >>> >>> DJE >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> looper-devel mailing list >>> loo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > |
|
From: Eckles, D. <Dav...@in...> - 2014-07-10 17:00:43
|
Just curious if there is any news on the development effort. We are getting to the position where we need to be able to support SNMPv3, so I was wondering if any development has been done toward that goal. If not, I may need to take on a rewrite of the snmpd_in module myself. >From my research, it appears that the strongest candidate for this is NetSNMP which ties into the system-level Net-SNMP daemon over the Net::SNMP - would you concur? Thanks! DJE -----Original Message----- From: Eckles, David [mailto:Dav...@in...] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 4:22 PM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure the module requirements are flexible for the environment. Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like the SNMPv3 module. Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. Jacob On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure > which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) > > Jacob > > On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >> >> DJE >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Francis, E. <Edw...@sa...> - 2014-02-17 10:50:52
|
Hello,
I have an environment where LooperNG is installed as a dumb trap forwarder so that we can duplicate an event stream into separate environments. On the one side traps are forwarded unchanged - this part is working fine. On the other side, I need to change the source address to be a natted value rather than the actual IP of the managed host (existing IP information cannot be forwarded to this environment). I have written into the Looper rules file, opening and reading from a lookup file that contains these natted addresses and passing them into a hash. I have print statements that show this is working as expected with the correct nat address for the original IP Address.
My problem comes assigning this to the trap values in a OID position. Ideally it needs to overwrite the existing value because we cannot pass any of the existing IP information, but I cannot seem to identify the correct field name to update. I have been experimenting with the $OUT{enhancetrap} to try and append a string to the varbinds of the raw trap and this works to an extent except that it assigns it to the last available varbind and I cannot seem to reference a specific varbind that I want to change the value of. I have attached a copy of the rules, such as they stand (although there are some non-final parts as I have been playing around with various permutations to try and get this working.)
Can anyone offer any advice here?
Thanks in advance,
Ed
This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) thereto without retaining any copies. |
|
From: Eckles, D. <Dav...@in...> - 2013-05-10 23:41:57
|
Cool - let me know when you have something you'd like to have beta tested and I can probably help out with that. It sounds like you are working on the core first - have you chosen a module for SNMP, as I believe there are a couple available? I may need to retrofit our production installation with SNMPv3 support sooner than later, which hopefully will fall within my skill level. Hopefully it won't be too huge of an undertaking to swap out SNMP_Session with Net::SNMP or similar. I might have something to share on the SNMP module front when you get to that point - -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:31 PM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure the module requirements are flexible for the environment. Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like the SNMPv3 module. Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. Jacob On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure > which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) > > Jacob > > On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >> >> DJE >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2013-05-10 23:01:58
|
It's going somewhere, but isn't necessarily going anywhere quickly. There hasn't been a lot of demand, either. We're currently looking to use AnyEvent to modularize the system with IP sockets for distribution (yeah, I doubt anyone needs or would use the feature, but hey, thinking big). But we're trying to write it in a manner that if you want to use POE, you can, or if you want to use a real message queue server, you can, or .. or .. I'm trying to make sure the module requirements are flexible for the environment. Since SNMPv3 is more of a module, and the rewrite is more from a core-out development, the core would be first followed by something like the SNMPv3 module. Though I say it isn't going anywhere quickly, we're probably close to having standard syslog and SNMP testable from a basic function and throughput standpoint ... nothing I'd toss into production yet. Jacob On 5/10/2013 3:13 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. > > Thanks! > DJE > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM > To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. > Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" > > SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure > which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) > > Jacob > > On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: >> Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! >> >> DJE >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> looper-devel mailing list >> loo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > |
|
From: Eckles, D. <Dav...@in...> - 2013-05-10 20:32:56
|
How is this initiative going? I have been planning my own development effort, which has not gone anywhere in the last year but need to get after supporting SNMPv3 in our environment. Thought I would see if any development has been in process and if there is any beta code that I can help test/develop. Thanks! DJE -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 5:47 AM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Looper "2.0" SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) Jacob On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! > > DJE > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Mike C. <Mik...@ma...> - 2013-01-25 18:25:10
|
Yea, that was kind of where I was getting stuck as I was going through the code. It looks like SNMP_Session could handle with some hacking but I wasn't sure if I was reading the package correctly. I've had to remove LooperNG from the mix for a while and just spin the probes up on the two interfaces. I've lost logging of raw traps and copying of all production traps to development for rules file testing. I can live without both options for a while but would like to get looper back in the mix. Hopefully Dustin's fix will work. -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Steinberger [mailto:tre...@re...] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:43 AM To: Looper/LooperDB mailing list. Subject: Re: [Looper-devel] Binding snmpd_in to a specific IP I dont think the default SNMP_Session will do it. Net::SNMPTrapd will, as you specify which IP and port to bind to. This means you'd have two input modules and could switch the rules accordingly. The perl examples provided with Net::SNMPTrapd is rather elegant in my opinion with a lot of functionality for listening, sending, capturing, storage, etc. I haven't seen a good and up-to-date module for v3 parsing, so I can't recommend one if that's a requirement. Jacob On 1/25/2013 10:13 AM, Mike Clark wrote: > Is it possible to bind snmpd_in module to a specific IP or > alternately, to know which of two (in my case) IP's a trap could have > come in from and process them differently in the rules file? > > *_______________________________________* > > *Mike Clark* > > */Sr. Manager, NMS Engineering/*// > > *Email *Mik...@ma... <mailto:Mik...@ma...> > > *Office *+1 214 442 8807 > > *Mobile *+1 214 454 2333 > > Description: Description: MAE-e-Sig-3 > > *Global Networking Redefined*** > > *www.masergy.com* <http://www.masergy.com/>** > > AOL: mwclark4453 > MSN: mc...@ad... <mailto:mc...@ad...> > Y!: mwclark_dallas > ICQ: 20250715 > > "*/nanos gigantum humeris insidentes/**/" Bernard of Chartres/* > > */"nankurunaisa" George Miyagusuku/* > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, > HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your > skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials > by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more > at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > > > > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ looper-devel mailing list loo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Dustin M. <dma...@gm...> - 2013-01-25 17:42:07
|
I believe I have a patch to do this that never got committed. Let me see if I can find it On Jan 25, 2013 11:26 AM, "Jacob Steinberger" <tre...@re...> wrote: > I dont think the default SNMP_Session will do it. > > Net::SNMPTrapd will, as you specify which IP and port to bind to. This > means you'd have two input modules and could switch the rules > accordingly. The perl examples provided with Net::SNMPTrapd is rather > elegant in my opinion with a lot of functionality for listening, > sending, capturing, storage, etc. > > I haven't seen a good and up-to-date module for v3 parsing, so I can't > recommend one if that's a requirement. > > Jacob > > On 1/25/2013 10:13 AM, Mike Clark wrote: > > Is it possible to bind snmpd_in module to a specific IP or alternately, > > to know which of two (in my case) IP’s a trap could have come in from > > and process them differently in the rules file? > > > > *_______________________________________* > > > > *Mike Clark* > > > > */Sr. Manager, NMS Engineering/*// > > > > *Email *Mik...@ma... <mailto:Mik...@ma...> > > > > *Office *+1 214 442 8807 > > > > *Mobile *+1 214 454 2333 > > > > Description: Description: MAE-e-Sig-3 > > > > *Global Networking Redefined*** > > > > *www.masergy.com* <http://www.masergy.com/>** > > > > AOL: mwclark4453 > > MSN: mc...@ad... <mailto:mc...@ad...> > > Y!: mwclark_dallas > > ICQ: 20250715 > > > > "*/nanos gigantum humeris insidentes/**/" Bernard of Chartres/* > > > > */"nankurunaisa" George Miyagusuku/* > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > looper-devel mailing list > > loo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > |
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2013-01-25 17:26:09
|
I dont think the default SNMP_Session will do it. Net::SNMPTrapd will, as you specify which IP and port to bind to. This means you'd have two input modules and could switch the rules accordingly. The perl examples provided with Net::SNMPTrapd is rather elegant in my opinion with a lot of functionality for listening, sending, capturing, storage, etc. I haven't seen a good and up-to-date module for v3 parsing, so I can't recommend one if that's a requirement. Jacob On 1/25/2013 10:13 AM, Mike Clark wrote: > Is it possible to bind snmpd_in module to a specific IP or alternately, > to know which of two (in my case) IP’s a trap could have come in from > and process them differently in the rules file? > > *_______________________________________* > > *Mike Clark* > > */Sr. Manager, NMS Engineering/*// > > *Email *Mik...@ma... <mailto:Mik...@ma...> > > *Office *+1 214 442 8807 > > *Mobile *+1 214 454 2333 > > Description: Description: MAE-e-Sig-3 > > *Global Networking Redefined*** > > *www.masergy.com* <http://www.masergy.com/>** > > AOL: mwclark4453 > MSN: mc...@ad... <mailto:mc...@ad...> > Y!: mwclark_dallas > ICQ: 20250715 > > "*/nanos gigantum humeris insidentes/**/" Bernard of Chartres/* > > */"nankurunaisa" George Miyagusuku/* > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d > > > > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > |
|
From: Dustin M. <dma...@gm...> - 2012-10-04 19:04:05
|
James, Sorry for the late reply. The easiest solution would be to grab the latest snmpd_in and snmptrap_out from the Mercurial repos: http://looper.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/looper/looperng/raw-file/bb75204c9844/looperng/modules/input/snmpd_in http://looper.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/looper/looperng/raw-file/bb75204c9844/looperng/modules/output/snmptrap_out And overwrite the existing ones with those two. Once you do that, your rules will simple be something like: %OUT = (); $OUT{rawtrap} = $IN {rawtrap}; if (defined($IN{addaddr})) { $OUT{addaddr} = $IN{addaddr}; $OUT{agentaddr} = $IN{agentaddr}; } SEND ('trapgen2'); Once you get that going, you can start getting fancier by deciding where to send traps based upon $IN{enterprise} or $IN{agentaddr}. -Dustin On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 7:43 PM, James Pifer <je...@ob...> wrote: > [I apologize if this message comes throughs as html. I cannot find anywhere to make sure it > isn't in Pegasus Mail].... > > I'm looking for a way to forward snmp traps from one host to another as I'm testing Zenoss. I > came across LooperNG but havnig some issues getting it working. > > It seems to run correctly. Using wireshark i can see snmp traps coming in on port 162, but > I'm not getting any on the destination server. > > Information below, any help is apprciated. > > Thanks, > James > > My conf file looks like: > rulesfile = '[__LOOPER_HOME__]/conf/rules/trapfwd.rules' > > # Set log level and location. The location can be overridden > # with the --stderr switch. > loglevel = '9' > logfile = '/opt/local/looper/log/looper.log' > > # Set the listen port for the admin server (--port). > port = '5400' > > # MD5 encrypted password. Use --md5 to generate a new password. > password = 'cf79217d6d9da75c6605bffb8eeabb96' > > # Start an SNMP trap collector called snmpd_in1 > input snmpd_in1 { > # Don't start the module. Any parameter that begins with > # two underscores is processed by LooperNG and applies to > # all modules. > __autostart = 'yes' > > # Module file name > module = 'snmpd_in' > > debugmessages = '/opt/local/looper/log/snmpd_in.log' > debugmode = '9' > } > > > # A RAW trap forwarder > output trapgen2 { > __autostart = 'yes' > module = 'snmptrap_out' > > # Where to send traps to > managementstation = '192.168.1.3' > port = '162' > community = 'public' > > # Setting rawmode to 1 tells it to blindly forward > # the trap in $OUT{rawtrap} without rewriting it. $OUT{rawtrap} > # should be a base64 encoded SNMP trap PDU. The snmpd_in > # module delivers this token in $IN{rawtrap}. > rawmode = '1' > > debugmode = '9' > debugmessages = '/opt/local/looper/log/trapgen2.log' > } > > My rules file looks like: > # This here is a sample rules file for a simple > # trap forwarder. > > for (keys %IN) { > $OUT{$_} = $IN{$_} unless m/^__/; > } > SEND ('logfile_out1'); > > %OUT = (); > $OUT{rawtrap} = $IN {rawtrap}; > > # By setting the enhancetrap field, you can add data to > # the raw trap. Eg., customer name, location etc. > > # The varbind OID used below is the same one as defined in > # the configuration file, with a suffix of .1000. The string > # can be arbitrarily long. > > ##$OUT{enhancetrap} = "customer-status = Production"; > > # By setting the convert field, you can force LooperNG to > # convert SNMPv2 traps to SNMPv1 traps. > # > # This extremely useful for forwarding traps to systems > # that do not interpret the RFC 2576 SNMPv2 snmpTrapAddress.0 > # varbind. Converting the traps allows LooperNG to set the > # SNMPv1 'agent-addr' parameter so that the receiving station > # can correctly identify the original trap sender. > > if ($IN{snmp_version} == 2) { > $OUT{agentaddress} = $IN{agentaddr}; > $OUT{convert} = 1; > } > > SEND ('trapgen2'); > > My log files look like: > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [system] Starting LooperNG with PID 24351 with > loglevel 9 > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] Opening module: trapgen2 > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [debug] Adding module 'trapgen2' to heap... > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] Opening module: snmpd_in1 > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [debug] Adding module 'snmpd_in1' to heap... > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [system] Starting admin server on port 5400 > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] Loading rules file: > /opt/local/looper//conf/rules/trapfwd.rules > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [debug] Parsing rules: > sub user_rules { > my ($self, $kernel, $heap, $id) = @_[OBJECT, KERNEL, HEAP, ARG0]; > my $module = $heap->{tasks}{$id}; > > LOG (4, "user_rules: $module->{TaskName}"); > > # This here is a sample rules file for a simple > # trap forwarder. > > for (keys %IN) { > $OUT{$_} = $IN{$_} unless m/^__/; > } > SEND ('logfile_out1'); > > %OUT = (); > $OUT{rawtrap} = $IN {rawtrap}; > > # By setting the enhancetrap field, you can add data to > # the raw trap. Eg., customer name, location etc. > > # The varbind OID used below is the same one as defined in > # the configuration file, with a suffix of .1000. The string > # can be arbitrarily long. > > ##$OUT{enhancetrap} = "customer-status = Production"; > > # By setting the convert field, you can force LooperNG to > # convert SNMPv2 traps to SNMPv1 traps. > # > # This extremely useful for forwarding traps to systems > # that do not interpret the RFC 2576 SNMPv2 snmpTrapAddress.0 > # varbind. Converting the traps allows LooperNG to set the > # SNMPv1 'agent-addr' parameter so that the receiving station > # can correctly identify the original trap sender. > > if ($IN{snmp_version} == 2) { > $OUT{agentaddress} = $IN{agentaddr}; > $OUT{convert} = 1; > } > > SEND ('trapgen2'); > > } > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] stderr: 2: snmpd_in: running: logging to > /opt/local/looper/log/snmpd_in.log > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] stderr: 1: snmptrap_out: running: logging to > /opt/local/looper/log/trapgen2.log > > > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmpd_in] [system] Starting snmpd_in input module with PID > 24353 > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmpd_in] [system] Listening for traps... > > > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmptrap_out] [system] snmptrap_out running with PID 24352 > [Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmptrap_out] [system] Starting in raw mode. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got visibility? > Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. > Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: James P. <je...@ob...> - 2012-10-01 01:17:07
|
[I apologize if this message comes throughs as html. I cannot find anywhere to make sure it
isn't in Pegasus Mail]....
I'm looking for a way to forward snmp traps from one host to another as I'm testing Zenoss. I
came across LooperNG but havnig some issues getting it working.
It seems to run correctly. Using wireshark i can see snmp traps coming in on port 162, but
I'm not getting any on the destination server.
Information below, any help is apprciated.
Thanks,
James
My conf file looks like:
rulesfile = '[__LOOPER_HOME__]/conf/rules/trapfwd.rules'
# Set log level and location. The location can be overridden
# with the --stderr switch.
loglevel = '9'
logfile = '/opt/local/looper/log/looper.log'
# Set the listen port for the admin server (--port).
port = '5400'
# MD5 encrypted password. Use --md5 to generate a new password.
password = 'cf79217d6d9da75c6605bffb8eeabb96'
# Start an SNMP trap collector called snmpd_in1
input snmpd_in1 {
# Don't start the module. Any parameter that begins with
# two underscores is processed by LooperNG and applies to
# all modules.
__autostart = 'yes'
# Module file name
module = 'snmpd_in'
debugmessages = '/opt/local/looper/log/snmpd_in.log'
debugmode = '9'
}
# A RAW trap forwarder
output trapgen2 {
__autostart = 'yes'
module = 'snmptrap_out'
# Where to send traps to
managementstation = '192.168.1.3'
port = '162'
community = 'public'
# Setting rawmode to 1 tells it to blindly forward
# the trap in $OUT{rawtrap} without rewriting it. $OUT{rawtrap}
# should be a base64 encoded SNMP trap PDU. The snmpd_in
# module delivers this token in $IN{rawtrap}.
rawmode = '1'
debugmode = '9'
debugmessages = '/opt/local/looper/log/trapgen2.log'
}
My rules file looks like:
# This here is a sample rules file for a simple
# trap forwarder.
for (keys %IN) {
$OUT{$_} = $IN{$_} unless m/^__/;
}
SEND ('logfile_out1');
%OUT = ();
$OUT{rawtrap} = $IN {rawtrap};
# By setting the enhancetrap field, you can add data to
# the raw trap. Eg., customer name, location etc.
# The varbind OID used below is the same one as defined in
# the configuration file, with a suffix of .1000. The string
# can be arbitrarily long.
##$OUT{enhancetrap} = "customer-status = Production";
# By setting the convert field, you can force LooperNG to
# convert SNMPv2 traps to SNMPv1 traps.
#
# This extremely useful for forwarding traps to systems
# that do not interpret the RFC 2576 SNMPv2 snmpTrapAddress.0
# varbind. Converting the traps allows LooperNG to set the
# SNMPv1 'agent-addr' parameter so that the receiving station
# can correctly identify the original trap sender.
if ($IN{snmp_version} == 2) {
$OUT{agentaddress} = $IN{agentaddr};
$OUT{convert} = 1;
}
SEND ('trapgen2');
My log files look like:
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [system] Starting LooperNG with PID 24351 with
loglevel 9
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] Opening module: trapgen2
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [debug] Adding module 'trapgen2' to heap...
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] Opening module: snmpd_in1
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [debug] Adding module 'snmpd_in1' to heap...
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [system] Starting admin server on port 5400
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] Loading rules file:
/opt/local/looper//conf/rules/trapfwd.rules
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [debug] Parsing rules:
sub user_rules {
my ($self, $kernel, $heap, $id) = @_[OBJECT, KERNEL, HEAP, ARG0];
my $module = $heap->{tasks}{$id};
LOG (4, "user_rules: $module->{TaskName}");
# This here is a sample rules file for a simple
# trap forwarder.
for (keys %IN) {
$OUT{$_} = $IN{$_} unless m/^__/;
}
SEND ('logfile_out1');
%OUT = ();
$OUT{rawtrap} = $IN {rawtrap};
# By setting the enhancetrap field, you can add data to
# the raw trap. Eg., customer name, location etc.
# The varbind OID used below is the same one as defined in
# the configuration file, with a suffix of .1000. The string
# can be arbitrarily long.
##$OUT{enhancetrap} = "customer-status = Production";
# By setting the convert field, you can force LooperNG to
# convert SNMPv2 traps to SNMPv1 traps.
#
# This extremely useful for forwarding traps to systems
# that do not interpret the RFC 2576 SNMPv2 snmpTrapAddress.0
# varbind. Converting the traps allows LooperNG to set the
# SNMPv1 'agent-addr' parameter so that the receiving station
# can correctly identify the original trap sender.
if ($IN{snmp_version} == 2) {
$OUT{agentaddress} = $IN{agentaddr};
$OUT{convert} = 1;
}
SEND ('trapgen2');
}
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] stderr: 2: snmpd_in: running: logging to
/opt/local/looper/log/snmpd_in.log
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [looperng] [info] stderr: 1: snmptrap_out: running: logging to
/opt/local/looper/log/trapgen2.log
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmpd_in] [system] Starting snmpd_in input module with PID
24353
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmpd_in] [system] Listening for traps...
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmptrap_out] [system] snmptrap_out running with PID 24352
[Sun Sep 30 19:27:25 2012] [snmptrap_out] [system] Starting in raw mode.
|
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2012-06-23 13:05:36
|
SNMPv3 is already on the requirements list for default support. Not sure which module/solution we'll be going with yet ;) Jacob On 6/22/2012 6:34 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! > > DJE > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > |
|
From: Dustin M. <dma...@gm...> - 2012-06-23 00:17:50
|
It'll require some work, but it shouldn't be as bad. v1->v2c (and back) required more changes due to the trap->notification conversion. Going from v2c->v3 (and back) keeps the same basic information, just changes the protocol security model. -Dustin On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Eckles, David <Dav...@in...> wrote: > Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! > > DJE > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Eckles, D. <Dav...@in...> - 2012-06-23 00:01:29
|
Great news - are you looking at implementing SNMPv3 capability, which would or course happen if moving away from SNMP_Session? Any thought as to Net::SNMP vs Net-SNMP? We're also looking at potentially converting SNMPv3 traps to SNMPv2 before forwarding them to back-end tools - hopefully this won't require moving heaven and earth! DJE |
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2012-04-20 00:30:19
|
I'm looking at doing a "2.0" rewrite moving away from POE. If you've always wanted a feature, now's probably a good time to request it. Jacob |
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2012-04-05 12:54:26
|
Now you have me interested ... I hate POE, which is why I dislike developing the core Looper and only tend to do modules. Tell me more about AnyEvent ... :D On 4/4/2012 8:49 PM, Dustin Marquess wrote: > Except that Looper uses SNMP_Session for trap handling. Moving it to > Net::SNMP was one of my TODOs, along with replacing the text passing > with something else (YAML or JSON?) and potentially replacing POE with > AnyEvent. > > I cant work on Looper at this time because of issues beyond my control, > and I haven't found anybody to maintain it in the interim. So right now > it is sadly on hiatus. > > -Dustin > > On Apr 4, 2012 7:41 PM, "Jacob Steinberger" <tre...@re... > <mailto:tre...@re...>> wrote: > > Net::SNMP supports V3, so it should take just a bit more tweaking to get > it to work. > > Or were you looking for something different/more? > > Jacob > > On 4/4/2012 4:50 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > > We've been running looperng (maintaining/enhancing it ourselves) in > > production for quite some time with very satisfactory results. > However, > > as time marches on, the need to support SNMPv3 is becoming more > necessary. > > > > It appears that this project has been abandoned, but I wanted to > check > > to see if there is any background work that may be going on or if > there > > is a successor. > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > looper-devel mailing list > > loo...@li... > <mailto:loo...@li...> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > <mailto:loo...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Dustin M. <dma...@gm...> - 2012-04-05 01:49:29
|
Except that Looper uses SNMP_Session for trap handling. Moving it to Net::SNMP was one of my TODOs, along with replacing the text passing with something else (YAML or JSON?) and potentially replacing POE with AnyEvent. I cant work on Looper at this time because of issues beyond my control, and I haven't found anybody to maintain it in the interim. So right now it is sadly on hiatus. -Dustin On Apr 4, 2012 7:41 PM, "Jacob Steinberger" <tre...@re...> wrote: > Net::SNMP supports V3, so it should take just a bit more tweaking to get > it to work. > > Or were you looking for something different/more? > > Jacob > > On 4/4/2012 4:50 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > > We've been running looperng (maintaining/enhancing it ourselves) in > > production for quite some time with very satisfactory results. However, > > as time marches on, the need to support SNMPv3 is becoming more > necessary. > > > > It appears that this project has been abandoned, but I wanted to check > > to see if there is any background work that may be going on or if there > > is a successor. > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > looper-devel mailing list > > loo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel > |
|
From: Jacob S. <tre...@re...> - 2012-04-05 00:41:18
|
Net::SNMP supports V3, so it should take just a bit more tweaking to get it to work. Or were you looking for something different/more? Jacob On 4/4/2012 4:50 PM, Eckles, David wrote: > We've been running looperng (maintaining/enhancing it ourselves) in > production for quite some time with very satisfactory results. However, > as time marches on, the need to support SNMPv3 is becoming more necessary. > > It appears that this project has been abandoned, but I wanted to check > to see if there is any background work that may be going on or if there > is a successor. > > Thank you! > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > looper-devel mailing list > loo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/looper-devel |
|
From: Eckles, D. <Dav...@in...> - 2012-04-04 22:17:17
|
We've been running looperng (maintaining/enhancing it ourselves) in production for quite some time with very satisfactory results. However, as time marches on, the need to support SNMPv3 is becoming more necessary. It appears that this project has been abandoned, but I wanted to check to see if there is any background work that may be going on or if there is a successor. Thank you! |
7 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
