In message <4C5...@lo...>
Derek Konigsberg <dko...@lo...> wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 2:57 AM, Jess Hampshire wrote:
>> On replies it puts the signature in the wrong place (above the quoted
>> text, like outlook does), what have I done wrong?
> Which means you might be one of those people who doesn't like
> top-posting :-)
Yes. :)
How can anyone produce a accurate reply to a long email on a tiny
screen by top posting? Of course, it isn't top or bottom posting, but
inline replies and removing the redundant text that are important.
(especially to those on limited data plans)
> (sorry, I normally do top-post, unless I'm trimming the quoted section,
> but I'll avoid it here)
Thanks.
> You are running the latest and greatest build of LogicMail. However,
> there really isn't any option for signature placement behavior. But as
> I reply to this message in Thunderbird, I'm seeing that putting the
> signature on the bottom of a reply is the correct behavior.
On replies, the client I mainly use (messenger pro) doesn't quote the
signature (thunderbird does the same).
On display it colours the different levels of quoted text.
new text: black
first quote blue ie one chevron
second quote red ie two chevrons
third quote red
fourth quote turquoise
signature grey
This would make emails far easier to read on a small screen,
(especially bouncing around on a train). Thunderbird will do this with
a plug-in called quote-colors (however, the default settings for the
plug-in are horrid, but it is really nice once configured, - don't
colour background, don't change chevrons to lines, change the colours
to less saturated versions)
These conventions were developed to make email efficient back when
small screens and limited bandwidth were the norm, which of course is
where we are now using a BlackBerry.
If these two were possible, then it would really enhance Logicmail.
> I just opened a ticket to track the issue, so feel free to comment on it
> if you have anything to add:
> http://www.logicprobe.org/proj/logicmail/ticket/220
Thanks.
With respect to forwarded messages, I'm not sure there is a proper
defined behaviour.
My client includes a header with the original Date: From: To: and
Subject: and a "Begin forwarded message" line. Then the message
(without additional chevrons added) Then "end of forwarded message"
Then the normal signature.
I don't think that a signature at the top would be wrong in this case,
but it should not have the standard separator because this would make
the whole message appear as the signature.
I have no idea whether adding chevrons is correct or not.
in favour - it indicates clearly that you didn't originate the
message.
against - it changes the original message.
Thanks
--
Jess Hampshire
Plain text emails with interleaved, trimmed replies please. (RFC 1855)
|
