[Logic-security-developers] Clarifications

[Vageli M. <com...@ya...>]

Okay it seems like there is a lot of clarification
needed.  Also, I am fully recovered and can now devote
my time to this project.

For starters, I do not see a .NET port in the cards at
this time.  I would like to see the fulfillment of the
objectives laid out in the roadmap.  Do you have any
particular reason why there should be a port to .NET? 
Does it offer any significant advantages over the
current language?

Secondly, after reading Greg's comments in the forum,
I think that we should create some script that will
act as a "beautifier".  We would run our code through
it before uploading to the CVS.  If anyone is
interested in writing one that adheres to the
programming guide lines, start a thread in the forum.

Note to Greg:  I personally dislike camel notation but
we could take a vote and see how many people would
like to institute it in place of the current
convention.

Finally, concerning the use of libraries; I do not
think libraries are an absolute must.  If we can find
an implementation in a regular source file we could
use that instead.  All I want is the implementation of
different algorithms, it doesn't matter how it is
done.

Note to All:  You should all consider monitoring the
developers forum so you can stay on top of posts
there.

I hope this clears up a few things.

--
Vageli Mouzakitis


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs