[Logic-security-developers] Re: Logic-security-developers digest, Vol 1 #10 - 1 msg
Brought to you by:
computergeek693
From: Amar G. <ama...@gm...> - 2005-08-31 07:14:14
|
Hi, I went through the Ultimate++ website. It seems impressive. I am going to= =20 download it soon. Let me see if I can work on that. There is a little bit o= f=20 documentation available. Else we can start a thread in the forum to share= =20 more information about it. I am looking into the codes presently. Lets see= =20 if I can be of some help in near future. We can certainly port the project to linux. I will go through it and=20 respond in the forum. regards Amar Gautam On 8/31/05, log...@li... < log...@li...> wrote:=20 >=20 > Send Logic-security-developers mailing list submissions to > log...@li... >=20 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/logic-security-developers >=20 > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > log...@li... >=20 > You can reach the person managing the list at > log...@li... >=20 > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Logic-security-developers digest..." >=20 >=20 > Today's Topics: >=20 > 1. GUI Toolkits (com...@ya...) >=20 > --__--__-- >=20 > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:17:47 -0700 (PDT) > From: "com...@ya..." <com...@ya...> > To: log...@li... > Subject: [Logic-security-developers] GUI Toolkits >=20 > I am still out, but feeling a little better; well > enough to type out this email before I go to sleep. >=20 > I have been wondering which GUI toolkit we will be > using for the frontend of the project. I am not a fan > of the WinAPI, and I want to keep the code as portable > as possible. I have never before used a GUI toolkit > and am open to any/all suggestions. Something has > caught my eye, however. A project by the name of > Ultimate++ (http://upp.sourceforge.net/) seems to be a > viable toolkit; it even includes its own IDE. The > project page does note that there is a lack of > documentation available but nonetheless..The project > looks pretty good to me. Anyone else want to check it > out? >=20 > Also, I would like to know exactly who is interested > in porting the project. The way to tell me this is to > respond to the "Linux" thread in the developer forum. > It would be helpful to also list what functions you > would especially like to port. >=20 > Finally, welcome to our latest member: gregtoombs aka > Greg. I don't think there has been much work on the > project up until this point and maybe a new face can > get us to start working. >=20 > IMPORTANT: I am thinking about pruning our list of > developers. I really do not like to have to do this > but I do not want people on the team that aren't > working. >=20 > Let's get started on the next release :) >=20 > -- > Vageli Mouzakitis >=20 > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >=20 >=20 >=20 > --__--__-- >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Logic-security-developers mailing list > Log...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/logic-security-developers >=20 >=20 > End of Logic-security-developers Digest >=20 --=20 This mail is from Amar Gautam [CapC] |