[Logic-security-developers] Makefiles, and includes
Brought to you by:
computergeek693
From: G M B. <bo...@uo...> - 2005-08-26 22:13:12
|
I've committed a makefile to the project CVS which should be able to tell us what's working an what's broken for linux. I don't have access to a windows compiler, and I removed some include statements from includes.h that Vageli said weren't being used anymore - this may break things. In the interests of cleaning up the code, I think that we should begin moving include statements out of includes.h and into the cpp files as needed - this will make it much easier to tell where the most work has to go for porting, and it will allow us to easily determine which libraries we need once we begin consolidating the functions into classes. One point that I wanted to maybe discuss before we get any farther, is should we be trying to make classes out of this code at all, or should we begin coding the next version of the project in an OO manner, starting from the ground up? What are your thoughts on this? --Matt |