[log4plsql] Re: Incubation of log4plsql

[<log...@li...>]

Guillaume,

As I tried to explain to you in our last private email exchange, I think it=
=20
is best if we waited for a few months before having this vote. Before=20
joining the ASF, we need to make sure that log4plsql functions as an open=20
project and has at least a CVS repository. The CVS repository was created=20
barely a few days ago. We still need more time to let log4jplsql evolve as=
=20
an open source project before making a decision.

If other logging PMC members feel that the above arbitrary, then I will=20
gladly abide by the will of the majority.

Thank you for your understanding,

At 04:11 PM 1/29/2004 +0100, gmo...@us... wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I represent the log4plsql project.
>
>we would be very happy if PMC accepte to start the
>log4plsql incubation process.
>We have sent the CLA and the software grant for
>log4plsql project.
>We have can use the Apache Software License.
>
>I ask the PMC to be granted committer access and,
>consequently, to start
>the log4plsql incubation process.
>
>
>Regards,
>Guillaume Moulard
>gmo...@us...

--=20
Ceki G=FClc=FC

      For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
      ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp =20