TR: [Log4plsql] dbms_pipe vs autonomus_transaction
Brought to you by:
gmoulard
From: <log...@li...> - 2003-03-18 08:51:54
|
Hi, Yes, is correct. And there is one proposition without dbms_pipe of the package by Dan Catalin. G. -----Message d'origine----- De : log...@li... = [mailto:log...@li...] Envoy=E9 : mardi 18 mars 2003 00:08 =C0 : log...@li... Objet : [Log4plsql] q: regarding transaction log off Hi , is it correct that you've choosen to use dbms_pipe instead of pragma = automuns_transaction to be more generic ?=20 (if you have the answer i'm a mailing list , a appolgize for the = repeating question ) -----Message d'origine----- De : log...@li... [mailto:log...@li...] Envoy=E9 : mercredi 13 novembre 2002 00:18 =C0 : log...@li... Objet : RE: [Log4plsql] dbms_pipe vs autonomus_transaction It seems to me more clear and easy to use and ... I saw some other = requests for this. Please find the changes attached. changes: renamed DEFAULT_USE_PIPE to DEFAULT_LOG_OFF_TRAN renamed all USE_PIPE occurrences to LOG_OFF_TRAN removed background* functions added two private procedures addRow addRowAutonomous changed log function to check LOF_OFF_TRAN and to call addRow or addRowAutonomous. =20 Please let me know if this is OK. If not I can make the changes you suggest. Should I add also other functions like isDebugEnabled() which exists in log4j? Thank you very much for your time. Dan Catalin -----Original Message----- From: log...@li... [mailto:log...@li...] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 06:27 AM To: log...@li... Subject: RE: [Log4plsql] dbms_pipe vs autonomus_transaction Bonjour,=20 I think : Why not. why your prefere autonomus_transaction versus dbms_pipe? Cordialement / Regards,=20 Guillaume Moulard=20 > -----Message d'origine----- > De : log...@li... > [mailto:log...@li...] > Envoy=E9 : vendredi 8 novembre 2002 21:15 > =C0 : log...@li... > Objet : [Log4plsql] dbms_pipe vs autonomus_transaction >=20 >=20 > Would be nice to be able to set how to log (using dbms_pipe=20 > or autonomus_transaction). >=20 > If the concern is 7.x does does not support this=20 > it would be nice to specify the version=20 > at the instalation time andthe install script will create the package=20 > with or without autonomus_transaction procedure in place. > What do you think? >=20 > Most of the times people nee to log outside of the current=20 > transaction=20 > and in the database, so the autonomus_transaction will be ok. >=20 > Catalin >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm=20 > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > _______________________________________________ > Log4plsql-all-info mailing list > Log...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/log4plsql-all-info > log4plsq : http://log4plsql.sourceforge.net |