From: William M. <wi...@kn...> - 2004-01-14 03:49:50
|
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:35:47PM -0800, Mike Schilli wrote: > I seem to remember that this has been suggested here before :). We've > been playing with this idea, but kind of stepped away from it because > it's too easy for different applications to step on each others feet (by > accidently using the same appender names etc.) without any effective > means to prevent that yet. Yeah, I seem to recall that thread now that you mention it. I didn't understand the reason for the discussion at the time but it sure makes sense now! Ain't perspective grand?! > And some day, we're gonna tackle this "Logger Repository" issue, I > promise :). How's the Logger Repository issue different from the init_once function which you have already incanted into 0.42? Seems like they are addressing the same issue of having calling init multiple times. I guess the Logger Repository is a bit broader, but I don't have all the background. Thanks, William -- Knowmad Services Inc. http://www.knowmad.com |