From: <Msc...@ao...> - 2003-01-31 17:49:15
|
In a message dated 1/31/03 9:07:40 AM Pacific Standard Time, ke...@go... writes: > What was the final disposition of the 017Watch.t test? My position > would be that if we can't trust the timestamps on the filesystem, the > whole init_and_watch system is going to break down. There's two different things to consider: Initial offset and continuous drift. Without really having looked at the code, I would suspect that we could easily resolve the first item by determinining the offset the first time around. My concern was just that if you've got a file system that's a bit off (like the one I was using), the Log::Log4perl test suite will fail. This is not of immediate concern, though, I'll keep it on the TODO list. > And what was the final disposition of 036JSyslog.t? I just changed it > to always succeed. That way it won't keep log4perl from installing, but > it will give some indication to the user whether they can expecte syslog > logging to work on their system. I just did that right now, so you'll > need to update the web site (you didn't send to cpan yet, right?) It's not on CPAN yet. I'm not too happy with the change -- my experiments just showed warnings, same warnings as you get when installing Log::Dispatch. It wasn't breaking the test suite. Ok if we leave 036JSyslog.t as it was for now? -- Mike Mike Schilli log...@pe... |