From: <Msc...@ao...> - 2002-08-02 18:31:00
|
In a message dated 8/2/02 5:57:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Yoa...@mp... writes: > We've always stuck with the very basic > Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(MyClass.class.getName()) > That's what I thought -- it's probably too confusing to introduce a 2nd hierarchy unrelated to the class design. That's very valuable information for me, it's great that you've got such extensive experience using log4j in large projects. Thanks! -- Mike Mike Schilli log...@li... |