Re: [log4perl-devel] signal handling and log4perl

[Seth D. <log...@se...>]

On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 04:51:47PM -0700, Mike Schilli wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2009, Seth Daniel wrote:
>
>> I was hoping for a solution that didn't burn two signals.  I'm already
>> using the most obvious signals: HUP, USR1, USR2, KILL, QUIT, etc...
>> so I'm not exactly overflowing with extra signals. :o)
>
> I see ... in the next version of Log4perl (1.23), you'll be able to call
>
>     Log::Log4perl::Config->watcher->force_next_check();
>
> instead of using a signal:
>
>     http://github.com/mschilli/log4perl/commit/6c8609f1ba064d3f781769cb9e1b45638f3daa75
>
> (will probably go out soon).


That's fantastic.  Thank you Mike.

-- 
seth /\ sethdaniel.org