|
From: Ceki <cg...@qo...> - 2001-06-13 10:56:04
|
Greetings, Since yesterday evening a non-negligible number of requests were directed to jav...@en.... I find Ellis Teer's comments (included below) quite interesting. My critique of the JSR47 API can be found at: http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html If you agree with its contents, you are encouraged to send your own comments to jav...@en... Thanks, Ceki >Delivered-To: cg...@qo... >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:35:16 -0700 (PDT) >From: Ellis Teer <e_...@ya...> >Subject: JSR47 vs. log4j >To: jav...@en... > >To whom it may concern, > >I feel that the differences between log4j and the JSR47 API outlined at the >following URL are significant. > >http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html > >I also feel, that rather than reinventing the wheel the JSR47 group should >incorporate the log4j API rather than recreating it. The standards put forth >by the JSR group will eventually replace any similarly functioning external API >due to its incorporation into the JDK. For the number of people who already >use log4j, such as myself, it feels that Sun by way of including this new API >in the JDK is forcing users of log4j to switch. I understand that there are >licensing issues but I suspect Ceki would be accommodating in this regard. > >In addition, by incorporating such projects into the API rather than recreating >them from scratch I believe Sun will promote more projects like these to move >forward rather than possibly dissuading programmers from creating new API's for >fear that their work will become useless by Sun's recreation of their features >in the next JDK. > >I point to the success of Tomcat as an example. > >Sincerely, > >-Ellis Teer |