Re: [Log4cplus-devel] State of log4cplus 1.x vs. 2.x

[Václav H. <vha...@gm...>]

On 26 March 2018 at 17:21, <Sim...@bt...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to implement an adapter from our internal Logging API to
> log4cplus, and I am unsure which version to target. Log4cplus 2.0 has not
> been released yet, but I would prefer to use that as a target if it is
> likely to be released in the next months. What needs to be done for
> log4cplus to be released? Maybe I could assist in getting it done as soon I
> have a running prototype adapter.
>
>
>
> If there are major obstacles in releasing 2.0, I would probably better
> stick with 1.2.x for now, right?
>

​Well, there have not been any significant changes on the 2.0.x ​branch for
some time. I could probably just release it as it is now. If you could try
using 2.0.x branch, that would be awesome. If you do not encounter
initialization or destruction issues or leaks then I think the branch is
releasable.



>
>
> Best regards
>
>
> i.A. Simon Giesecke
> BU Operations
> Smart Market
> Senior Consultant
>
> BTC Business Technology Consulting AG
>
> Kurfürstendamm 33
>
> 10719 Berlin
>
> Tel:      +49 441 3612-4826 <+49%20441%2036124826>
> Mobil:   +49 174 9081611 <+49%20174%209081611>
> Fax:     +49 441 3612-3999 <+49%20441%2036123999>
> E-Mail:  Sim...@bt...
> Web:     www.btc-ag.com
>
>
> Rechtliche Hinweise:
>
> www.btc-ag.com/impressum.htm
>
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Oldenburg HRB 4717
>
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Heidkamp
>
> Vorstand: Dr. Jörg Ritter, Dirk Thole
>
>
>
>
-- 
VH