From: Polhodzik P. (ext) <Pet...@ev...> - 2013-11-25 12:17:42
|
All right, I take the whole as ASL 2.0 Thank you VZ Peter -----Original Message----- From: Václav Zeman [mailto:vha...@gm...] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:52 PM To: Polhodzik Peter (ext) Cc: log...@li... Subject: Re: [Log4cplus-devel] Dual or multiple licensed? On 25 November 2013 12:14, Polhodzik Peter (ext) wrote: > Hi, > > > > Is log4cplus > > · dual licensed à BSD 2 clause or Apache 2.0, or > > · multiple licensed à both BSD 2 clause and Apache 2.0? This one, I think. There are source files licensed under the ASL 2.0 and other source files licensed under the two clause BSD license. AFAIK, IANAL, if you treat the whole as ASL 2.0, everything should be fine. -- VZ |