From: Alexander N. <neu...@kd...> - 2012-05-20 12:51:47
|
On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Václav Zeman wrote: > Hi. > > I have only recently realized that log4cplus is being used wider than > I thought. The most important (in my eyes) piece of software that I > have recently discovered using log4cplus is BIND 10. This led me to > realization that I need more information about log4cplus' users and > uses. Thus I would like to ask you for feedback about log4cplus. Feel > free to post answers to following questions to > <log...@li...> mailing list or privately to > myself. > > 1. What version of log4cplus are you using in what product/library of your > own? > > 2. What lead you to choose log4cplus over other competing (log4cpp, > log4cxx, Pantheios, etc.) libraries? It is relatively small. It is "alive". It has a license which allows it to be used in proprietary applications. It doesn't have any extra dependencies. > 3. What do you miss in log4cplus? I'm using the Rolling File Appender, and use the day of the week as part of the filename, so there are in general log files from the last 7 days present. Now it would be nice if it would also start a new log file at midnight. As it is now, if the log file is started Monday and the application runs for more days, all logging still goes into the same file (as long as the maximum size has not been reached). > 4. More comments? Works great :-) Alex |