Bugs item #3101459, was opened at 2010-11-02 02:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wilx
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=429073&aid=3101459&group_id=40830
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: v1.0.4
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Jacek Sieka (arnetheduck)
Assigned to: Václav Zeman (wilx)
Summary: TTCCLayout should print millis since start, not date/time
Initial Comment:
According to the documentation, the first field of TTCClayout should be milliseconds since startup - instead it prints formatted date/time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Václav Zeman (wilx)
Date: 2012-07-03 11:03
Message:
This is now fixed on trunk as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Václav Zeman (wilx)
Date: 2010-11-23 09:36
Message:
I have implemented the behaviour as described by the documentation in
revision 1490 on PRODUCITON_1_0_x branch. Now, when DateFormat property of
TTCCLayout is not set or when it is empty, the time is shown as
milliseconds since start of application.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Václav Zeman (wilx)
Date: 2010-11-04 14:40
Message:
The docs were taken from log4j docs verbatim, it seems. Unfortunately,
log4cplus does not implement the behaviour/layout the same as log4j does.
The relative time since start is not possible at the moment. You could get
absolute (instead of relative) time in milliseconds since epoch using
"%s%q" for DateFormat property. I will fix the documentation to reflect the
real state of things and I will try to implement the relative time some
time in the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=429073&aid=3101459&group_id=40830
|
