Can someone tell me why a call was not made at this location?
lofreq call -f /var/www/hg19.fa --min-bq 0 --min-alt-bq 0 --bed foo.bed --verbose --debug -a 0.1 -b 1 --min-mq 0 foo.bam
DEBUG(plp.c|compile_plp_col): Processing chr3:178936091 chr3 178936091 G G counts:rv/fw A:8/10 C:1/0 G:216/627 T:0/4 N:0/0 heads:0 tails:3 ins:0 del:0 hrun=1 DEBUG(lofreq_call.c|call_snvs): chr3 178936091: passing down 866 quals with noncons_counts (18, 1, 4) to snpcaller(num_snv_tests=15 conf->bonf=1, conf->sig=0.100000)
Hi Erik,
hard to tell from this output. Might be because of strand bias. Could you rerun with '-r chr3:178936091-178936091 --no-default-filter' and see what the variant and SB qualities are?
Thanks, Andreas
On 29 March 2016 at 01:13, Erik Reckase ereckase@users.sf.net wrote:
Can someone tell me why a call was not made at this location? lofreq call -f /var/www/hg19.fa --min-bq 0 --min-alt-bq 0 --bed foo.bed --verbose --debug -a 0.1 -b 1 --min-mq 0 foo.bam DEBUG(plp.c|compile_plp_col): Processing chr3:178936091 chr3 178936091 G G counts:rv/fw A:8/10 C:1/0 G:216/627 T:0/4 N:0/0 heads:0 tails:3 ins:0 del:0 hrun=1 DEBUG(lofreq_call.c|call_snvs): chr3 178936091: passing down 866 quals with noncons_counts (18, 1, 4) to snpcaller(num_snv_tests=15 conf->bonf=1, conf->sig=0.100000) Why was this call filtered out? Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/lofreq/discussion/general/ To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
Why was this call filtered out?
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/lofreq/discussion/general/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
-- Andreas Wilm andreas.wilm@gmail.com | mail@andreas-wilm.com | 0x7C68FBCC
Log in to post a comment.
Can someone tell me why a call was not made at this location?
lofreq call -f /var/www/hg19.fa --min-bq 0 --min-alt-bq 0 --bed foo.bed --verbose --debug -a 0.1 -b 1 --min-mq 0 foo.bam
Hi Erik,
hard to tell from this output. Might be because of strand bias. Could
you rerun with '-r chr3:178936091-178936091 --no-default-filter' and
see what the variant and SB qualities are?
Thanks,
Andreas
On 29 March 2016 at 01:13, Erik Reckase ereckase@users.sf.net wrote:
--
Andreas Wilm
andreas.wilm@gmail.com | mail@andreas-wilm.com | 0x7C68FBCC