From: Viktor M. <vi...@ma...> - 2010-04-03 00:33:56
|
this messages appear constantly in the terminal after ./configuring and while 'making' Muse. Are they relevant or important? -mtune=x86_64 is deprecated; use -mtune=k8 or -mtune=generic -- --- Viktor Mastoridis --------------------- www.Meditera.co.uk |
From: Viktor M. <vi...@ma...> - 2010-04-03 00:37:13
|
here's my configure sentence for my friend's amd64 laptop: ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-dssi --enable-python --enable-arch=x86_64 --enable-optimize QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3 |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2010-04-03 01:59:51
|
On Saturday 03 April 2010 11:36:47 Viktor Mastoridis wrote: > here's my configure sentence for my friend's amd64 laptop: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-dssi --enable-python > --enable-arch=x86_64 --enable-optimize QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3 no expert here Viktor, but i'd just let gcc work it out i.e- by adding ' -- enable-optimize' you should get the arch optimizations for your architecture. without the need for adding the specific architecture. i think that it's only necessary when your compiler is out of whack with your actual cpu arch. lash = linux audio session management system.. google it. you don't really need it doxygen creates the documents/manuals you don't want to debug unless you're an idiot like me ;) sse optimizations arn't fit for use yet and i think are currently broken anyway; don't worry about them; they are for audio only. jade is another doc system- not important hth g. -- Geoff Beasley __________________________________________________________________ Composer,Arranger,Performer,Producer. Studio: (03) 9416-9988 Mob:0409-309449 Laughing Boy Records 2 Stott Street, Preston, Victoria, Australia 3072 www.laughingboyrecords.com |
From: Tim E. R. <ter...@ro...> - 2010-04-03 04:09:43
|
On April 2, 2010 09:55:34 pm Geoff Beasley wrote: > On Saturday 03 April 2010 11:36:47 Viktor Mastoridis wrote: > > here's my configure sentence for my friend's amd64 laptop: > > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-dssi --enable-python > > --enable-arch=x86_64 --enable-optimize QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3 > > no expert here Viktor, but i'd just let gcc work it out i.e- by adding ' -- > enable-optimize' you should get the arch optimizations for your > architecture. without the need for adding the specific architecture. > > i think that it's only necessary when your compiler is out of whack with > your actual cpu arch. Sounds like if you really want to, go with K8. I like to always use pentium4 for this P4 box, but not strictly necessary. (Hmm, if we ever get a K9 we could nickname it 'The dog'). > > lash = linux audio session management system.. google it. you don't really > need it > > you don't want to debug unless you're an idiot like me ;) For that we added the --enable-Geoff flag, he he... > > sse optimizations arn't fit for use yet and i think are currently broken > anyway; don't worry about them; they are for audio only. Yes, don't bother with them for now. > > doxygen creates the documents/manuals > jade is another doc system- not important Sadly the built-in docs are neglected and badly out of date by now anyway. Far better to go to: http://www.muse-sequencer.org or http://www.muse-sequencer.org/index.php/Manual With recent changes, even some things there are a wee bit out of date now. Thanks for helping out there G. Tim. |
From: Viktor M. <vi...@ma...> - 2010-04-03 12:11:15
|
Thank you guys, what about the recent python add-ons? How do I enable them and where do I find them? > --enable-python (is unrecognised) > > > Sounds like if you really want to, go with K8. > I like to always use pentium4 for this P4 box, but not strictly necessary. > so, do I use --enable-arch=k8 for all x86_64 computers? Some other question: I started using Pure:Dyne recently, Muse 1 was not installed by default, and so I mailed their list. They said that Muse isn't included because it isn't packaged and if I want, they could teach me how to package for Ubuntu. I am willing to do that, because I believe that Muse deserves to be seen much more. Although configuring and installing Muse is my top development job I have done so far, eventually I might figure it out. So,is there anything I don't know? Why Muse isn't packaged? You simply don't have enough time to package it, or there's more to it....? Otherwise, initial report: latest Muse installs fine, iR works 'as advertised', (recent?) Calf additions so welcome (the organ works great, didn't have time to use the others, will write more feedback soon). Viktor |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2010-04-04 00:10:02
|
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 13:10 +0100, Viktor Mastoridis wrote: > Thank you guys, > > > what about the recent python add-ons? How do I enable them and where > do I find them? > --enable-python (is unrecognised) it's 'on' by default; you need to enable it by using -p on the command line when starting muse. type muse -h to see what startup options are available at run time. best, g. |
From: <bab...@gm...> - 2010-04-03 14:11:29
|
Hi guys, Philip Johnsson already made an ubuntu deb from version 1.0. He is a very nice and addicted guy and we ask him, I am quite sure he won't hesitate to build the latest version of muse for us. His repo is very useful for audio users and can be found here https://launchpad.net/~philip5/+archive/extra?field.series_filter=karmic Greetings, Michael Viktor Mastoridis schrieb: > > Thank you guys, > > > what about the recent python add-ons? How do I enable them and where > do I find them? > > --enable-python (is unrecognised) > > > > > > Sounds like if you really want to, go with K8. > I like to always use pentium4 for this P4 box, but not strictly > necessary. > > > so, do I use --enable-arch=k8 for all x86_64 computers? > > > Some other question: I started using Pure:Dyne recently, Muse 1 was > not installed by default, and so I mailed their list. They said that > Muse isn't included because it isn't packaged and if I want, they > could teach me how to package for Ubuntu. > > I am willing to do that, because I believe that Muse deserves to be > seen much more. Although configuring and installing Muse is my top > development job I have done so far, eventually I might figure it out. > > So,is there anything I don't know? Why Muse isn't packaged? You simply > don't have enough time to package it, or there's more to it....? > > Otherwise, initial report: latest Muse installs fine, iR works 'as > advertised', (recent?) Calf additions so welcome (the organ works > great, didn't have time to use the others, will write more feedback soon). > > Viktor > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-user mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user > |
From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2010-04-04 15:30:40
|
Hi guys (still alive here :-), Just wanted to mention that a month or so ago (probably more) I tried MusE as shipped with the coming Ubuntu 10.04 and it seems to work fine (a very brief test) http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/sound/muse I gather Pure:Dyne is based on ubuntu, which should mean that it hopefully will get the new muse at the next revision lift. As for why we don't package. Traditionally it has been separated from development as there are so many different distributions. I.e: software project provides a source release each distributions packagers provide the binary package. The drawback with this is that there may be a significant delay between the source release and the time when it appears for a specific distribution. We could by all means help with the latter too if we had the manpower and knowledge. Victor, if you are interested and it is missing for your distro you are much encouraged to learn more about the process and if you can speed it up. Regards, Robert ... which is way behind, need to try the latest MusE additions soon :-) 2010/4/3 bab...@gm... <bab...@gm...>: > Hi guys, > > Philip Johnsson already made an ubuntu deb from version 1.0. He is a > very nice and addicted guy and we ask him, I am quite sure he won't > hesitate to build the latest version of muse for us. > > His repo is very useful for audio users and can be found here > https://launchpad.net/~philip5/+archive/extra?field.series_filter=karmic > > Greetings, > Michael > > > Viktor Mastoridis schrieb: >> >> Thank you guys, >> >> >> what about the recent python add-ons? How do I enable them and where >> do I find them? >> >> --enable-python (is unrecognised) >> >> >> >> >> >> Sounds like if you really want to, go with K8. >> I like to always use pentium4 for this P4 box, but not strictly >> necessary. >> >> >> so, do I use --enable-arch=k8 for all x86_64 computers? >> >> >> Some other question: I started using Pure:Dyne recently, Muse 1 was >> not installed by default, and so I mailed their list. They said that >> Muse isn't included because it isn't packaged and if I want, they >> could teach me how to package for Ubuntu. >> >> I am willing to do that, because I believe that Muse deserves to be >> seen much more. Although configuring and installing Muse is my top >> development job I have done so far, eventually I might figure it out. >> >> So,is there anything I don't know? Why Muse isn't packaged? You simply >> don't have enough time to package it, or there's more to it....? >> >> Otherwise, initial report: latest Muse installs fine, iR works 'as >> advertised', (recent?) Calf additions so welcome (the organ works >> great, didn't have time to use the others, will write more feedback soon). >> >> Viktor >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lmuse-user mailing list >> Lmu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-user mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user > |