From: Dan M. <al...@gm...> - 2012-11-22 07:46:12
|
Hi list! 2.1 is sounding great - shame I can't use it at all yet! Did Tim and Robert notice the recent release of the new Radium sequencer? Amongst many other new features, 1.9.x now features VST plugin support which he has unashamedly borrowed from qtractor http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=10276 The new 1.9.x series of Radium has a lot of new features: * Audio. * A quick-to-use modular mixer. Jack ports can be inserted anywhere. * VST plugins and instruments (native, not via wine) ... and Rui Nuno Capela for QTractor. (Plugin GUI code are based on code taken from QTractor.) I realise you want to get a couple more bugs squashed before 2.1 first but PLEASE make VST plugin support a priority after this release - pretty please! LV2 may be the future but VST has all the existing plugins Thanks devs! |
From: Tim E. R. <ter...@ro...> - 2012-11-22 09:23:20
|
On November 22, 2012 07:46:06 AM Dan MacDonald wrote: Hi list! 2.1 is sounding great - shame I can't use it at all yet! Did Tim and Robert notice the recent release of the new Radium sequencer? Amongst many other new features, 1.9.x now features VST plugin support which he has unashamedly borrowed from qtractor http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=10276 The new 1.9.x series of Radium has a lot of new features: * Audio. * A quick-to-use modular mixer. Jack ports can be inserted anywhere. * VST plugins and instruments (native, not via wine) ... and Rui Nuno Capela for QTractor. (Plugin GUI code are based on code taken from QTractor.) I realise you want to get a couple more bugs squashed before 2.1 first but PLEASE make VST plugin support a priority after this release - pretty please! LV2 may be the future but VST has all the existing plugins Thanks devs! Hang in there, Robert and I were discussing this and we are going ahead with the native vst. I started but decided better get the 2.1 ready first. The problem is it requires some changes to our plugin and synth system, which are slightly LADSPA and VST centric. Not really something I want to throw out there in the 2.1 release. But the good news is that we believe we can leverage our existing code in our old defunct vst module - which used the old FST. I took a look and have started modifying that vst module with initial success in the scanner and loader sections. It's do-able I think. It better be! He he. I am super-revving to go on this but be patient. But it is here where the work must now branch into our plugin and synth code. This work is necessary, also a good "warm-up practice" to prepare for LV2. So I had to stop while we make ol' MusE clean and happy for 2.1 Tim. |
From: Dan M. <al...@gm...> - 2012-11-22 09:32:17
|
Most splendiferous news indeed Timothy! I couldn't have hoped for a better response than that! :D On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Tim E. Real <ter...@ro...> wrote: > ** > > On November 22, 2012 07:46:06 AM Dan MacDonald wrote: > > Hi list! > > 2.1 is sounding great - shame I can't use it at all yet! > > Did Tim and Robert notice the recent release of the new Radium sequencer? > Amongst many other new features, 1.9.x now features VST plugin support > which he has unashamedly borrowed from qtractor > > http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=10276 > > The new 1.9.x series of Radium has a lot of new features: > * Audio. > * A quick-to-use modular mixer. Jack ports can be inserted anywhere. > * VST plugins and instruments (native, not via wine) > > ... > > and Rui Nuno Capela for QTractor. (Plugin GUI code are based on code taken > from QTractor.) > > I realise you want to get a couple more bugs squashed before 2.1 first but > > PLEASE > > make VST plugin support a priority after this release - pretty please! > > LV2 may be the future but VST has all the existing plugins > > Thanks devs! > > Hang in there, Robert and I were discussing this and we are going ahead > > with the native vst. > > I started but decided better get the 2.1 ready first. > > The problem is it requires some changes to our plugin and synth system, > > which are slightly LADSPA and VST centric. > > Not really something I want to throw out there in the 2.1 release. > > > > But the good news is that we believe we can leverage our existing > > code in our old defunct vst module - which used the old FST. > > I took a look and have started modifying that vst module with initial > > success in the scanner and loader sections. It's do-able I think. > > It better be! He he. I am super-revving to go on this but be patient. > > But it is here where the work must now branch into our plugin and synth > code. > > This work is necessary, also a good "warm-up practice" to prepare for LV2. > > So I had to stop while we make ol' MusE clean and happy for 2.1 > > > > Tim. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-user mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user > > |
From: Tim E. R. <ter...@ro...> - 2012-11-22 10:40:15
|
> The problem is it requires some changes to our plugin and synth system, > which are slightly LADSPA and VST centric. Duh, that should read LADSPA and DSSI centric. Tim. |
From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2012-11-22 09:37:49
|
Hi Dan and Tim, 2012/11/22 Tim E. Real <ter...@ro...> > ** > > On November 22, 2012 07:46:06 AM Dan MacDonald wrote: > > Hi list! > > 2.1 is sounding great - shame I can't use it at all yet! > > Did Tim and Robert notice the recent release of the new Radium sequencer? > Amongst many other new features, 1.9.x now features VST plugin support > which he has unashamedly borrowed from qtractor > > http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=10276 > > The new 1.9.x series of Radium has a lot of new features: > * Audio. > * A quick-to-use modular mixer. Jack ports can be inserted anywhere. > * VST plugins and instruments (native, not via wine) > > ... > > and Rui Nuno Capela for QTractor. (Plugin GUI code are based on code taken > from QTractor.) > > I realise you want to get a couple more bugs squashed before 2.1 first but > > PLEASE > > make VST plugin support a priority after this release - pretty please! > > LV2 may be the future but VST has all the existing plugins > > Thanks devs! > > Hang in there, Robert and I were discussing this and we are going ahead > > with the native vst. > Indeed! Dan, sorry for being a bit secretive but we have infact been working (mostly Tim, ahem) on this and it will be grand :) Regards, Robert I started but decided better get the 2.1 ready first. > > The problem is it requires some changes to our plugin and synth system, > > which are slightly LADSPA and VST centric. > > Not really something I want to throw out there in the 2.1 release. > > > > But the good news is that we believe we can leverage our existing > > code in our old defunct vst module - which used the old FST. > > I took a look and have started modifying that vst module with initial > > success in the scanner and loader sections. It's do-able I think. > > It better be! He he. I am super-revving to go on this but be patient. > > But it is here where the work must now branch into our plugin and synth > code. > > This work is necessary, also a good "warm-up practice" to prepare for LV2. > > So I had to stop while we make ol' MusE clean and happy for 2.1 > > > > Tim. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-user mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user > > |
From: Dan M. <al...@gm...> - 2012-11-22 10:53:18
|
Hi list! On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Robert Jonsson <spa...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Dan and Tim, > > 2012/11/22 Tim E. Real <ter...@ro...> > > ** >> >> On November 22, 2012 07:46:06 AM Dan MacDonald wrote: >> >> Hi list! >> >> 2.1 is sounding great - shame I can't use it at all yet! >> >> Did Tim and Robert notice the recent release of the new Radium sequencer? >> Amongst many other new features, 1.9.x now features VST plugin support >> which he has unashamedly borrowed from qtractor >> >> http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=10276 >> >> The new 1.9.x series of Radium has a lot of new features: >> * Audio. >> * A quick-to-use modular mixer. Jack ports can be inserted anywhere. >> * VST plugins and instruments (native, not via wine) >> >> ... >> >> and Rui Nuno Capela for QTractor. (Plugin GUI code are based on code >> taken from QTractor.) >> >> I realise you want to get a couple more bugs squashed before 2.1 first but >> >> PLEASE >> >> make VST plugin support a priority after this release - pretty please! >> >> LV2 may be the future but VST has all the existing plugins >> >> Thanks devs! >> >> Hang in there, Robert and I were discussing this and we are going ahead >> >> with the native vst. >> > > Indeed! > Dan, sorry for being a bit secretive but we have infact been working > (mostly Tim, ahem) on this and it will be grand :) > > Regards, > Robert > No prob Rob! What matters is you're both keen to get this done soon after 2.1 goes gold. My workflow dictates native VST support as a mandatory feature for my DAW and I won't be the only one so its nice to hear this has already been prodded at with promising results. Muse seems to be coming on leaps and bounds in the last year or so. Keep up the great work team and I look forward to contributing more when VST support arrives. Dan |