From: Robert Jonsson <rj@sp...> - 2004-08-06 23:15:30
l=F6rdagen den 7 augusti 2004 00.47 skrev davidrclark@...:
> Thanks for your reply. I appreciate all the work you've done on this
> > > which does indeed suggest that use of ulimit -l is a workaround.
> > This is not conclusive with my own findings, I don't argue there is a
> > problem but there are probably other things which interfere also.
> I think you may have misunderstood my meaning. =20
Ah, sorry, I was referring to the link, infact I have not tried the ulimit=
workaround since I don't have this problem now.
The link pointed out a problematic scenario, but config listed as bad I thi=
I had successfully ran, hence I think there are more variables.
> I am not saying that=20
> ulimit -l is an acceptable solution. I'm saying that AT BEST it's a
> workaround that may help some. It's something to try. It's better
> than locking up the system. It may give someone a chance to determine
> whether or not, for example, they really want to persue MusE any further
> after looking at it.
Yep, no arguing about that. :)
> Thanks again and Regards,
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.