From: alex s. <com...@gm...> - 2010-04-05 07:08:38
|
Going Up and Down to Next/Previous track. I can see bindings called Up and Down for moving from track to track, but after trying up and down arrows, and the Page Up/Down keys, nothing seems to happen. Are the Up/Down arrows intended to navigate tracks? If so, they don't seem to work at the moment. Alex. -- www.openoctave.org mid...@op... dev...@op... |
From: Alex S. <ale...@gm...> - 2013-04-13 23:44:32
|
A couple of FR for workflow. The "C" binding toggles the metronome in the arranger. Could we have the same for the pianoroll as well? We use numerical keys (usually KP) to set note durations for input. Could we have at least some of these to set the Snap in the arranger, preferably identical to the values in the pianoroll for equivalent durations? Thanks Alex. |
From: Florian J. <flo...@we...> - 2013-05-23 00:16:42
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
push. you might file a bug report or feature request, if not already done. Am 14.04.2013 01:44, schrieb Alex Stone: > A couple of FR for workflow. > > The "C" binding toggles the metronome in the arranger. Could we have the > same for the pianoroll as well? > > We use numerical keys (usually KP) to set note durations for input. > > Could we have at least some of these to set the Snap in the arranger, > preferably identical to the values in the pianoroll for equivalent > durations? > > Thanks > > Alex. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced > analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building > apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use > our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! > http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer |
From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2010-04-05 21:44:55
|
Hi alex, I seldom use these shortcuts but I believe they are for moving between parts (Mathias invention and I know he uses it all the time) There was some work for moving selected track with the keyboard too but I believe it is disabled, not sure why (run out of shortcuts?!) I'll make a check later this week to see if it can be enabled. /Robert 2010/4/5 alex stone <com...@gm...>: > Going Up and Down to Next/Previous track. > > I can see bindings called Up and Down for moving from track to track, > but after trying up and down arrows, and the Page Up/Down keys, > nothing seems to happen. > > Are the Up/Down arrows intended to navigate tracks? If so, they don't > seem to work at the moment. > > Alex. > -- > www.openoctave.org > > mid...@op... > dev...@op... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer > |
From: alex s. <com...@gm...> - 2010-04-06 04:42:46
|
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Robert Jonsson <spa...@gm...> wrote: > Hi alex, > > I seldom use these shortcuts but I believe they are for moving between > parts (Mathias invention and I know he uses it all the time) > > There was some work for moving selected track with the keyboard too > but I believe it is disabled, not sure why (run out of shortcuts?!) > I'll make a check later this week to see if it can be enabled. > > /Robert > > 2010/4/5 alex stone <com...@gm...>: >> Going Up and Down to Next/Previous track. >> >> I can see bindings called Up and Down for moving from track to track, >> but after trying up and down arrows, and the Page Up/Down keys, >> nothing seems to happen. >> >> Are the Up/Down arrows intended to navigate tracks? If so, they don't >> seem to work at the moment. >> >> Alex. >> -- >> www.openoctave.org >> >> mid...@op... >> dev...@op... >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Lmuse-developer mailing list >> Lmu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer >> > Ok, thanks Robert. The actions i'm trying to find are moving track to track with bindings. So each track in turn is highlighted, and with the feature just built (moving record-arm with track) that means quickly navigating a large score, without having to switch tracks with a mouse. (blech) Alex. -- www.openoctave.org mid...@op... dev...@op... |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2010-04-06 23:44:36
|
hey Alex... great to have another power user around to really rev these guys up eh? hehehe thanks for the track arm assignment change Robert--much appreciated ;) MusE is totally amazing and getting better all the time thanks to Tim and Robert. You've made some good suggestions there Alex;- hope they get implemented. here's a re-iteration of a sync control suggestion i made recently (so it doesn't get forgotten-- by me too !) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- wouldn't it be nice to be able to engage/disengage the sync status of the midi sync page via the sync button on the transport bar; i.e what ever the status of that page is could be engaged/disengaged via that button. 1/ button out, muse clocks to itself 2/ button in, muse syncs to whatever the midi sync page says. you will need to separate out the midi and jack syncs but they are mutually exclusive anyway. just have it either/or. sounds to lme like irt should be simple enuff and would make life much easier in a large production environment like mine (and yours too Alex?) as it is a per session basis requirement i see no issue with that model. whaddayathink? best, g. -- Geoff Beasley __________________________________________________________________ Composer,Arranger,Performer,Producer. Studio: (03) 9416-9988 Mob:0409-309449 Laughing Boy Records 2 Stott Street, Preston, Victoria, Australia 3072 www.laughingboyrecords.com |
From: alex s. <com...@gm...> - 2010-04-07 06:44:34
|
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Geoff Beasley <ge...@la...> wrote: > hey Alex... great to have another power user around to really rev these guys > up eh? hehehe > > thanks for the track arm assignment change Robert--much appreciated ;) > > MusE is totally amazing and getting better all the time thanks to Tim and > Robert. You've made some good suggestions there Alex;- hope they get > implemented. > > here's a re-iteration of a sync control suggestion i made recently (so it > doesn't get forgotten-- by me too !) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > wouldn't it be nice to be able to engage/disengage the sync status of the midi > sync page via the sync button on the transport bar; i.e what ever the status > of that page is could be engaged/disengaged via that button. > > 1/ button out, muse clocks to itself > 2/ button in, muse syncs to whatever the midi sync page says. you will need to > separate out the midi and jack syncs but they are mutually exclusive anyway. > just have it either/or. sounds to lme like irt should be simple enuff and would > make life much easier in a large production environment like mine (and yours > too Alex?) > > as it is a per session basis requirement i see no issue with that model. > > whaddayathink? > > best, > > g. > > -- > Geoff Beasley > __________________________________________________________________ > Composer,Arranger,Performer,Producer. > Studio: (03) 9416-9988 Mob:0409-309449 > Laughing Boy Records > 2 Stott Street, Preston, Victoria, Australia 3072 > www.laughingboyrecords.com > Geoff, this is a good idea. I'm trying to use jackmidi exclusively, so the sync source would be jack by default, in my particular use case. But i can also see the value in selecting the sync source as required. Alex. -- www.openoctave.org mid...@op... dev...@op... |
From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2010-04-21 19:12:54
|
Hi Alex, a few weekends later... I just checked in code to enable Ctrl+Up/Down to move between tracks in the arranger, lemme know if it works. /Robert 2010/4/6 alex stone <com...@gm...>: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Robert Jonsson <spa...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi alex, >> >> I seldom use these shortcuts but I believe they are for moving between >> parts (Mathias invention and I know he uses it all the time) >> >> There was some work for moving selected track with the keyboard too >> but I believe it is disabled, not sure why (run out of shortcuts?!) >> I'll make a check later this week to see if it can be enabled. >> >> /Robert >> >> 2010/4/5 alex stone <com...@gm...>: >>> Going Up and Down to Next/Previous track. >>> >>> I can see bindings called Up and Down for moving from track to track, >>> but after trying up and down arrows, and the Page Up/Down keys, >>> nothing seems to happen. >>> >>> Are the Up/Down arrows intended to navigate tracks? If so, they don't >>> seem to work at the moment. >>> >>> Alex. >>> -- >>> www.openoctave.org >>> >>> mid...@op... >>> dev...@op... >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lmuse-developer mailing list >>> Lmu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer >>> >> > > Ok, thanks Robert. > > The actions i'm trying to find are moving track to track with > bindings. So each track in turn is highlighted, and with the feature > just built (moving record-arm with track) that means quickly > navigating a large score, without having to switch tracks with a > mouse. (blech) > > Alex. > -- > www.openoctave.org > > mid...@op... > dev...@op... > |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2010-04-21 21:51:28
|
On Thursday 22 April 2010 05:12:46 Robert Jonsson wrote: > a few weekends later... > I just checked in code to enable Ctrl+Up/Down to move between tracks > in the arranger, lemme know if it works. > that's cool Robert, thanks! great to see more 'user convenience' options being added. best, g. |
From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2010-04-21 19:15:42
|
Hi Geoff, > wouldn't it be nice to be able to engage/disengage the sync status of the midi > sync page via the sync button on the transport bar; i.e what ever the status > of that page is could be engaged/disengaged via that button. > > 1/ button out, muse clocks to itself > 2/ button in, muse syncs to whatever the midi sync page says. you will need to > separate out the midi and jack syncs but they are mutually exclusive anyway. > just have it either/or. sounds to lme like irt should be simple enuff and would > make life much easier in a large production environment like mine (and yours > too Alex?) I must be missing something, isn't this more or less how this button works? /Robert > > as it is a per session basis requirement i see no issue with that model. > > whaddayathink? > > best, > > g. > > -- > Geoff Beasley > __________________________________________________________________ > Composer,Arranger,Performer,Producer. > Studio: (03) 9416-9988 Mob:0409-309449 > Laughing Boy Records > 2 Stott Street, Preston, Victoria, Australia 3072 > www.laughingboyrecords.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer > |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2010-04-21 21:33:32
|
On Thursday 22 April 2010 05:15:31 Robert Jonsson wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > > wouldn't it be nice to be able to engage/disengage the sync status of the > > midi sync page via the sync button on the transport bar; i.e what ever > > the status of that page is could be engaged/disengaged via that button. > > > > 1/ button out, muse clocks to itself > > 2/ button in, muse syncs to whatever the midi sync page says. you will > > need to separate out the midi and jack syncs but they are mutually > > exclusive anyway. just have it either/or. sounds to lme like irt should > > be simple enuff and would make life much easier in a large production > > environment like mine (and yours too Alex?) > > I must be missing something, isn't this more or less how this button works? > > /Robert > ahh, no indeed it isn't. the sync button currently only engages/disengages midi sync. the only way to control jack transport is to call up the midi sync menu and engage/disengage enable/disable checkboxes. so, the sync button will enable you to go into and out of midi sync or have muse clock internally only. no jack transport control from the track pane window. the transport bar sync button really should be able to globally engage/disengage the alternate sync option set in the midi sync page or muse internal clock. as MC and jack transport are mutually exclusive anyway, it shouldn't be too hard to do. there are currently 3 sync options and perhaps 4 in the future with MTC if that ever gets fixed so ideally a way of selecting between them without having to use the current system would be good but more work than just adding the global functionality as I suggest to the sync button we have. i n other words, whatever the midi sync page has set the sync button should enable or disable. hope that makes sense. best, g. |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2010-04-21 22:01:32
|
On Thursday 22 April 2010 07:33:18 Geoff Beasley wrote: > whatever the midi sync page has set the sync button should enable or > disable. hope that makes sense. > a simpler way of putting this would be that if jack transport is enabled, then midi sync is disabled and vice versa... sync button engages whatever is currently selected. g. |
From: alex s. <com...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 04:51:18
|
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Geoff Beasley <ge...@la...> wrote: > On Thursday 22 April 2010 07:33:18 Geoff Beasley wrote: >> whatever the midi sync page has set the sync button should enable or >> disable. hope that makes sense. >> > a simpler way of putting this would be that if jack transport is enabled, > then midi sync is disabled and vice versa... sync button engages whatever is > currently selected. > > g. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer > Robert, the bindings work fine, and thanks for adding them. Another piece of the jigsaw in place for us workflow maniacs. Alex. -- www.openoctave.org mid...@op... dev...@op... |