From: Tim <ter...@ro...> - 2009-08-12 22:13:26
|
Hey folks! Hey Robert thanks for those XFCE patches, and to the persons who found them. Still here, kinda quiet with Muse though. Over the summer I tried attacking Muse on a couple of fronts: One was to add true wave part copying - at the moment there is no actual way to make a true copy of a wave part. Regardless of whether you copy or clone a wave part, the new part always references the old wave part's wave. This means if you edit a copy of a wave part the changes will apply to the original part too. But I kinda got stuck and haven't done more. Also I tried to add Jack midi, but again got kinda lost so haven't done much with it. Maybe once summer's over I'll try again. Summer weather here hasn't been too good. Waaay too much rain and cool in Eastern Canada, and no rain and waaay too hot in Western Canada. It has actually been hotter in Northern Canada than here in the South! Everything's melting up there! Hope your summer's going well. Tim. |
From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2009-08-13 12:42:30
|
Hey Tim! Too bad about the weather.. we have actually had quite a nice summer. Some rain yes, but on the whole it's been nice, I can't complain. No worries about MusE hacking. Sure it would be nice with the jack-midi integration but no need to hurry it. You've done tremendous work already, well worth a long break :) In other news, I've started preparing for the 1.0 release. It will happen before vacation is over. (that's the plan anyway ;) I was thinking about changing the splash for 1.0, already asked Joachim who did the current one if he wanted to do a new one. No reply yet. Might as well ask here too, anybody up for creating a new splash? Take care, Robert 2009/8/12 Tim <ter...@ro...>: > Hey folks! > Hey Robert thanks for those XFCE patches, > and to the persons who found them. > > Still here, kinda quiet with Muse though. > Over the summer I tried attacking Muse > on a couple of fronts: > One was to add true wave part copying - > at the moment there is no actual way to > make a true copy of a wave part. > Regardless of whether you copy or clone > a wave part, the new part always > references the old wave part's wave. > This means if you edit a copy of a wave part > the changes will apply to the original part too. > But I kinda got stuck and haven't done more. > > Also I tried to add Jack midi, but again got kinda lost > so haven't done much with it. > > Maybe once summer's over I'll try again. > Summer weather here hasn't been too good. > Waaay too much rain and cool in Eastern Canada, > and no rain and waaay too hot in Western Canada. > It has actually been hotter in Northern Canada > than here in the South! Everything's melting up there! > > Hope your summer's going well. > Tim. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer > |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2009-08-13 19:48:58
|
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:42:17 +1000, Robert Jonsson <spa...@gm...> wrote: > I was thinking about changing the splash for 1.0 (Ditto to Tim btw.) actually i like the existing splash, however a new look would help considerably; gui's are very, very important - i re-iterate my comments about upgrading or changing the track info pane look. surely something can be done to improve it. really does look terribly dated.all those ugly spinboxes and that 'grid' style approach has always given muse a very 80's feel to me. it's perfectly functional;just ugly. the track foemat of 2 was better tho not ideal imho. perhaps something more along those lines. with an improvement there, it would visually reflect the amount of work that has been done this year and definately show an immediate 'freshness' to folks having a new look at the old girl. this is in no way a complaint you understand, but this game is "eye-candy" driven as i'm sure you're all well aware. i have no idea how difficult it would be to do. can you enlighten me? is there anyway i could help? best, g. |