From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2012-02-14 00:34:06
|
btw, i gave that talk about Linux pro audio here in January. FWIW here's the link to checkout the slides of the presentation. The diagrams of the various developments of LinAS may be of interest. http://linux.conf.au/wiki/index.php/Miniconfs/MultimediaAndMusic and look for me :) best g |
From: Tim E. R. <ter...@ro...> - 2012-02-14 05:47:24
|
On February 14, 2012 10:33:19 AM Geoff Beasley wrote: > btw, i gave that talk about Linux pro audio here in January. FWIW > here's the link to checkout the slides of the presentation. The diagrams > of the various developments of LinAS may be of interest. > http://linux.conf.au/wiki/index.php/Miniconfs/MultimediaAndMusic and > look for me :) > > best > > g > Hey nice slide show. Nice that MusE is involved. Hope it's still relevant for you. Didn't see it in the LinAS V3.0 Have not tried Ardour3. What do you think of the midi support? I guess I've always thought of MusE as suitable for small desktop or small studio, good for making demo CDs or recording your band and such. Don't know how well it fares in a large studio with other monster apps. Ardour3 better suited for that? But need an engineer just to learn and run it? MScore sure looks nice these days. So many nice apps these days. How you making out with MusE's dssi and Kontact? Or did you switch back to FST for that? Cheers. Tim. |
From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2012-02-14 06:21:24
|
On 02/14/2012 04:46 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > Hey nice slide show. thanks > Nice that MusE is involved. Hope it's still relevant for you. > Didn't see it in the LinAS V3.0 ahh, that's because I'm using a single machine for all the audio production software now - so Ardour3,Muse2,FST and Linuxsampler etc etc are all on the one machine now. > Have not tried Ardour3. What do you think of the midi support? to use an Australianism - it's shit hot :) however, it's midi implementation is shit house imho - there just isn't enough visual feedback for my liking. it's like most audio focused soft that adds midi later - midi is the poor cousin. in any case Ardour,like all NLE's ,is about object manipulation not true "editing" per se. > I guess I've always thought of MusE as suitable for small desktop or small > studio, good for making demo CDs or recording your band and such. > Don't know how well it fares in a large studio with other monster apps. > Ardour3 better suited for that? But need an engineer just to learn and run it? nah, Muse is a work horse. It shines with large midi sessions these days imo. > MScore sure looks nice these days. So many nice apps these days. it's amazing and getting some serious interest. Go Werner ! > How you making out with MusE's dssi and Kontact? > Or did you switch back to FST for that? I still use fst for Kontakt2, but Sampletank is most stable inside Muse2 :) As I have said before, running it under vsthost crashes frequently - no so in Muse2 I'm very glad to say - well done you ! best g |