From: Geoff B. <son...@bi...> - 2008-06-01 03:38:14
|
I have removed, updated & regressed jack and now muse .9-cvs is opening and behaving normally. that's about 5-6 jack changes in 24 hours \0/ go figure (again) hello muse.... :~0 g. |
From: Geoff B. <son...@bi...> - 2008-06-01 03:45:30
|
nuh. after a reeboot and with linuxsampler/zynaddsubfx running with qjack same jack error. this is the last message on this ..apologies for all the noise folks bye. g |
From: Geoff B. <son...@bi...> - 2008-06-04 01:55:47
|
one thing that i have asked many times about is how to remove duplicate notes in MuSE. There seems no way. Is that so? If so, it's the one glaring ommission in MuSE's feature set. please tell me it can be done... g. |
From: Tim <ter...@ro...> - 2008-06-04 04:17:37
|
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 09:55:41 pm Geoff Beasley wrote: > one thing that i have asked many times about is how to remove duplicate > notes in MuSE. There seems no way. Is that so? If so, it's the one glaring > ommission in MuSE's feature set. please tell me it can be done... > I thought Werner put some code in there for that... Pianoroll->Functions->DeleteOverlaps. Haven't tried it. Different thing? If you mean two notes sitting on top of each other in the piano roll, can't you just delete whichever one muse happens to select when you click them, then you're left with the note(s) underneath? Or how about using the event list, do duplicate events show up in the list? If so, can you delete one duplicate event without deleting the others? (I can't remember if it's an all or nothing affair...) |
From: Mathias L. <mat...@da...> - 2008-06-04 09:37:48
|
Tim skrev: > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 09:55:41 pm Geoff Beasley wrote: > >> one thing that i have asked many times about is how to remove duplicate >> notes in MuSE. There seems no way. Is that so? If so, it's the one glaring >> ommission in MuSE's feature set. please tell me it can be done... >> >> > I thought Werner put some code in there for that... > Pianoroll->Functions->DeleteOverlaps. > Haven't tried it. Different thing? > > If you mean two notes sitting on top of each other in the piano roll, > can't you just delete whichever one muse happens to select when you > click them, then you're left with the note(s) underneath? > Or how about using the event list, do duplicate events show up in the list? > If so, can you delete one duplicate event without deleting the others? > (I can't remember if it's an all or nothing affair...) > > The delete overlaps is something that I added last year or so (yay, I actually did something the last years!! :-) ) when I was annoyed on some midis I imported. It checks if two notes start at the same time on the same pitch and deletes one of them if so, it doesn't check that the notes have the same length. Was this what you were looking for Geoff? /Mathias |
From: Tim <ter...@ro...> - 2008-06-05 00:58:17
|
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 05:37:20 am you wrote: > The delete overlaps is something that I added last year or so (yay, I > actually did something the last years!! :-) ) when I was annoyed on some > midis I imported. It checks if two notes start at the same time on the > same pitch and deletes one of them if so, it doesn't check that the > notes have the same length. Was this what you were looking for Geoff? > > /Mathias Oh yeah, sorry, Werner added something for stuck notes/sustain recently, and Mathias the "Master of Midi", added the other one. And one of them added that 'space bar' shortcut thing recently, too... Tim. |
From: Geoff B. <son...@bi...> - 2008-06-05 06:37:34
|
thank Mathias ! I hadn't seen this !! I'll test out tomorrow.... cheers ;) (btw, how's mum and bubs? hope they are well .... and the sleep thing... remember that ?? ! :) ) g. |
From: Geoff B. <son...@bi...> - 2008-06-05 22:32:20
|
i'm trying the latest jack-svn and it looks pretty darn good, and on the new 2.6.25.4-rt5 kernel things are very promising indeed. however, MuSE has the same issue with it as before. Will there be any update to MuSE .9x jack support or is that too much work ? best, g. |
From: Tim <ter...@ro...> - 2008-06-07 20:06:54
|
On Thursday 05 June 2008 06:32:09 pm you wrote: > i'm trying the latest jack-svn and it looks pretty darn good, and on the > new 2.6.25.4-rt5 kernel things are very promising indeed. however, MuSE has > the same issue with it as before. Will there be any update to MuSE .9x jack > support or is that too much work ? > Right now my situation is this: My main PC's distro's QT is too old for muse 2, but my aux PC has it (and muse 2) installed, but I don't fire it up too often. (It too has jack 103.) Soon I will have to upgrade the main PC, and I know I may be faced with these problems if I want the new jack. But at least I'll be able to concentrate on muse 2 more... For the moment, I am weary of installing the new jack on the main PC. Jack is such an integral part of the system, and so many apps use it, that I insist on building a jack package and installing it, because if I install from source, then installing jack app packages fail because there is no jack package installed. So if the new jack turns out to be a problem, downgrading the jack package is scary for me, I've had problems before. Anyways for the moment, I don't want to try it. I'm concentrating on getting muse acceptable for release 1. Yeah I know, it won't be much use if people have problems with the new jack... So I suppose I *should* try new jack at some point with the main PC in its current form... I'll let you know... Tim. |
From: Geoff B. <son...@bi...> - 2008-06-08 01:39:50
|
On Sunday 08 June 2008 06:21:28 Tim wrote: > Right now my situation is this: > My main PC's distro's QT is too old for muse 2, > but my aux PC has it (and muse 2) installed, > but I don't fire it up too often. (It too has jack 103.) > Soon I will have to upgrade the main PC, > and I know I may be faced with these problems > if I want the new jack. But at least I'll be able to > concentrate on muse 2 more... i get all that ;) > For the moment, I am weary of installing the new jack > on the main PC. Jack is such an integral part of the > system, and so many apps use it, that I insist on building > a jack package and installing it, because if I install from > source, then installing jack app packages fail because there > is no jack package installed. > So if the new jack turns out to be a problem, downgrading > the jack package is scary for me, I've had problems before. that too... > Anyways for the moment, I don't want to try it. > I'm concentrating on getting muse acceptable for release 1. absolutely > Yeah I know, it won't be much use if people have problems > with the new jack... already there > So I suppose I *should* try new jack at some point with > the main PC in its current form... I'll let you know... please do. The new jack is looking very much more stable than any of the old one's. is there any issue you know of with gcc and MuSE? or maybe any other lib which could be causing this issue? i have rebuilt all the machines recently with newer everything; maybe that's why MuSE .9 is now so unstable with jack? The saddest thing is I now have to find a new seq, or buils a 3rd machine just to host MuSE in a jack0.103.0 environment. In fact this, I will do to finish this album anyway. best, g. |