From: Paul W. <pa...@ma...> - 2008-09-22 15:19:02
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mifth wrote: | Is that a guess or not? Possibly we should just contact to audacity, | qtracktor and muse developers and make negotiations with them. To ask | them to join or take part in lmms project. | | But I'm not a developer, I'm a user. I'm not able cause this is not my | level. But I dream of joining good projects. My opinion is that LMMS solves different problems to Rosegarden, Ardour, or whatever. Its features work well for some situations, and don't for others. As an example, most of the people who want sheet music output don't need the other features in LMMS anyway. Trying to make one application that does everything is, in my opinion, a good way to make it also not do anything well. This is why I think that having wave-recording facilities in LMMS is a waste of programmer time. There are already plenty of other programs that do that kind of thing well. Running one in the background and then playing the song in LMMS to sing along to is a perfectly good solution; you're going to have to sync the audio up anyway, and possibly clean it up as well. So the wave-recording feature in LMMS will then need an 'export track as WAV file' feature (which puts it basically back where we started) or needs to include all the audio editing features of, say, Audacity (which ends up with the 'does nothing well' scenario). Again, all my opinion, don't let it distract you... :-) Have fun, Paul -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjXtxwACgkQu7W0U8VsXYIFnQCeIPVTPrCq9B62L/9PM1Sksic3 aFQAoI1gYsDQr060zVSgDzuYWgs6tSJ0 =yYA8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |